Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
Many people believe that as the standard of livinghuman standard of living improvesgets better, this improvement will haveit will have a negative effect on the environment. To a certain extentpoint, I would agree with the statement, but it really depends on the methods we choosemethod that we choose to improve our lifestyle.
It is a fact that some people choose to focus on improving the standard of living without any concern forof the environment around themtheir surrounding environment. As a consequence, many natural areas have been damaged, causinghave been damaged and caused the extinction of some species. Moreover, cars, refrigerators, air-conditioners, room heaters, etc.room-heathers etc have improved the way we live our lives on the one handour life on one hand but have also causedand also caused environmental degradation on the other hand. Industrialisation, factories, large offices, luxury apartments, air travel, etc.air travel etc are all part of our improved lifestyle yetbut yet they have many negative consequences forto our environment.
On the other hand, we cannot generalise by sayingthe public could not generalise a statement that says "the improvement of the living standard will have a negative effect on the environment". It really depends on how the government of each country handleshandle it, as some countries have shown that they can managesome countries are proven that they could manage both aspects simultaneously. For instance, Canada is known as one of the advanced countries in the world, whereas the living standard of its people is better than many other countries. And the government keeps developinggovernment keep on developing methods, policies and procedures to improve the people's living standard. However, Canada is also known as one of the greenest countries in the world, as the government is also concernedconcern about preserving the originality and biodiversity of its nature.
In conclusion, to a certain extent, I would agree that the improvement of the living standard has negatively affectedaffected negatively to the environment. But it happens in some countries, whereas the governments have weak and unmeasured regulations. There are some countries thatwho could manage between improving the living standard and maintaining the environment, and their way of governing should be reviewed and followed by other countries to make the world a better place.
Why this response received Band 6.5
The essay presents a clear qualified position and develops both the environmental costs of higher living standards and the possibility of avoiding them through effective government policy. The Canada example gives the counterargument a concrete focus, although several claims remain broad and the negative-effects paragraph relies heavily on lists. The highest priority is to deepen the causal explanation while correcting frequent agreement, word-form and preposition errors.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response answers the extent question with a consistent qualified position and relevant arguments on both environmental damage and responsible development.
Explain one environmental mechanism in depth and show more precisely how government policy can break the claimed inevitability.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing and overall progression are clear, but some connectors are used inaccurately and list-like development weakens internal flow.
Build each body paragraph around one causal chain and use contrast markers only where the relationship is genuinely contrastive.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is sufficient to discuss development, regulation and environmental harm, but frequent collocation and word-form errors reduce precision.
Use natural combinations such as 'concern for the environment', 'environmental consequences' and 'concerned about preserving biodiversity'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A range of complex structures is attempted, but agreement, article and preposition errors recur throughout while meaning remains generally clear.
Check subject-verb agreement and verb patterns, especially in sentences about governments, countries and effects on the environment.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.