Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Climate change represents a major threat to life on Earth, but some people argue that we need to accept it rather than striving to curb ittry to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion because I believe that we still have time to address this crisistackle this issue and reduce the human impactreduce human impact on the Earth's climate.
There are various measures that governments and individuals could take to prevent, or at least mitigate, climate change. Governments could enact laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming. They could impose green taxes"green taxes" on drivers, airlines and other polluters, and simultaneously invest in renewable energy from solar, wind or hydropower. As individuals, we should also try to lower the adverse contribution toon climate change by becoming more energy efficient, flying less, and using bicycles and public transport. Beyond personal lifestyle changes, citizensFurthermore, the public can influence government action by votingaction, by voting for politicians who pledge to combatpropose to tackle climate change, rather than for those who would prefer to ignore it.
If, instead of taking these measures, we only try to live with climate change, I believe that the result will be disastrous. For example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with even a small rise in sea levelslevel. Millions of people would be displaced by flooding, particularly in countries that do not have the financialviable means to safeguard low-lying areas. These people would lose their homes and their jobs, forcing them to migrate to nearby cities or even other countries. As a result, the potential for human sufferingpotential harm for human suffering would be immense, and it would likely lead to outbreaks of diseasediseases and famine, as well as increased homelessness, poverty and death.
In conclusion, it is clear that we must address the problem of climate change, and I disagree with those who argue that we need to find a way to live with it.
Why this response received Band 8.0
This is a exceptionally well-written essay that presents a clear position and fully develops logical arguments with well-chosen examples and precise language. The response flows naturally through coherent paragraphing and demonstrates excellent grammatical accuracy throughout. To further refine the essay, the candidate could deepen the evaluation of why adapting alone is unsustainable compared to a dual strategy of prevention and adaptation.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The essay directly addresses the prompt, presenting a clear and consistent stance with well-developed supporting arguments.
Briefly acknowledge specific adaptation strategies before explaining why mitigation remains essential to provide a even more nuanced response.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing is logical and cohesive devices are used naturally to link ideas across the response.
Incorporate a wider variety of sophisticated transition phrases between key points to enhance rhetorical flow.
Lexical Resource
The writing demonstrates a wide range of topic-specific vocabulary used with high precision and flexibility.
Focus on substituting a few repetitive basic phrases with more sophisticated academic collocations.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide variety of complex sentence structures is used accurately with almost no grammatical or punctuation errors.
Maintain this high level of control while introducing more advanced structural inversions or complex conditional forms.