Public transports in many countries have improved. People should use public transport to support pollution control initiatives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
Sample Response
Many countries have made improvements in their public transportation systems, and encouraging people to choose buses, trains, or subways can have significant positive effects on the environment. As a result, I strongly agree that using public transport is vital to help control pollution and will discuss the reasons in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, mass transit produces fewer pollutants per person compared to private cars. For instance, a fully loaded bus produces fewer emissions per person than the equivalent number of individual cars. Therefore, it helps mitigate air pollution and contributes to a cleaner, healthier environment. Secondly, relying on collective transit can ease traffic obstructions in cities. Less traffic means fewer cars idling in jams, emitting harmful gasses. In many cities, many people have started using buses and the subway. Due to this, the streets became less crowded, and the air felt fresher.
Moreover, this mode of communication often costs less than owning and maintaining a private vehicle. By choosing buses or trains, people can save money on fuel, parking, and maintenance. This economic advantage can be a strong incentive for individuals to switch to public transport. Lastly, cities like Copenhagen and Singapore have successfully implemented comprehensive shared mobility systems, leading to a significant reduction in individual car usage and associated pollution. Consequently, these examples serve as models for other cities aspiring to control pollution through public transport campaigns.
To conclude, advocating for mass conveyance is a critical strategy in addressing pollution concerns, and numerous successful examples demonstrate its effectiveness in creating sustainable and environmentally friendly urban transportation systems. However, it is essential for governments to continue investing in and improving public transport infrastructure. Reliable and accessible services will encourage more people to make the switch.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Complete the comparison Original: compared to private cars Suggested revision: than private cars do Why it matters: The revised form compares the pollutants produced by the two transport modes directly.
- 2. Use natural collocation Original: obstructions Suggested revision: congestion Why it matters: Traffic congestion is the standard expression for crowded and slow-moving roads.
- 3. Correct the spelling Original: gasses Suggested revision: gases Why it matters: Gases is the correct plural spelling in this context.
- 4. Avoid repetition Original: In many cities, many people Suggested revision: In many cities, commuters Why it matters: Commuters removes the repeated many and identifies the relevant group more precisely.
- 5. Use the right term Original: communication Suggested revision: transport Why it matters: Public transit is a form of transport rather than a means of communication.
- 6. Match the main topic Original: comprehensive shared mobility systems Suggested revision: comprehensive public transport systems Why it matters: Public transport systems keeps the example aligned with the terminology used in the argument.
- 7. Use concise wording Original: individual car usage Suggested revision: private car use Why it matters: Private car use is a more natural and concise expression.
- 8. Choose a natural verb Original: aspiring Suggested revision: aiming Why it matters: Aiming is more natural than aspiring when describing a concrete policy objective.
- 9. Use consistent terminology Original: mass conveyance Suggested revision: public transport Why it matters: Public transport is the conventional term and matches the wording used throughout the response.
- 10. Use a direct verb Original: made improvements in their public transportation systems Suggested revision: improved their public transportation systems Why it matters: The direct verb improved expresses the same meaning more concisely.
- 11. Make wording concise Original: significant positive effects on the environment Suggested revision: significant environmental benefits Why it matters: Environmental benefits conveys the same idea with greater precision and economy.
- 12. Use precise measurement Original: fewer pollutants per person Suggested revision: fewer emissions per passenger Why it matters: Emissions per passenger is more precise for comparing transport-related pollution.
Suggested Rewrites
- compared to private cars than private cars do
- obstructions congestion
- gasses gases
- In many cities, many people In many cities, commuters
- communication transport
- comprehensive shared mobility systems comprehensive public transport systems
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response maintains a clear position and progresses logically through several relevant benefits of public transport, with effective explanation of reduced per-person emissions. Its main limitation is that some support is generic and the economic point is only indirectly connected to pollution control, while several strained word choices reduce precision. Develop fewer reasons in greater depth and use natural transport vocabulary consistently.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response answers the question directly and supports agreement with several relevant reasons, although some ideas remain general or indirectly linked to pollution.
Develop fewer supporting reasons more fully and show explicitly how each one contributes to pollution control.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is logically organised and easy to follow, though the numbered sequencing is somewhat mechanical and some transitions are abrupt.
Use more meaning-based transitions and integrate examples directly into the development of each main point.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied and generally effective, but several attempted synonyms create inaccurate or unnatural transport-related collocations.
Prefer precise, natural terms such as public transport and traffic congestion instead of strained alternatives like mode of communication or traffic obstructions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses a good range of sentence forms with generally strong control, despite several noticeable agreement and tense lapses.
Check clause subjects and maintain consistent tense, especially in the introduction and the example about changing city conditions.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Public transports in many countries have improved. People should use public transport to support pollution control initiatives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.