The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Some people opine that in an era marked by unprecedented scientific advancements, the paramount goal of science should fundamentally be directed towards improving the lives of individuals. I fully agreewholeheartedly concur with this notion and will elaborate on the reasons forsupporting this viewpoint.
The most compelling argument in favour of science's primary aim being the improvement of people's lives pertains to its immense possibility towards contributions to the field of health and medicine. Breakthroughs in medical science, such as the development of vaccines, antibiotics, and advanced surgical procedurestechniques, have substantially increased human life expectancyhave substantially extended human lifespans and reduced the burden of diseasediseases worldwide. For instance, the discovery of antibiotics like penicillin revolutionized medicine, saving countless lives and alleviating human suffering. However, there is still much more to achieveplenty to achieve in this field. Prioritising people's well-being as the primary objective of scientific advancement can eradicate deadly diseases worldwidefrom the face of the earth and make the world a better place to livemake it a better place to live in.
Another compelling reason to prioritize using science to improve people's livesAnother compelling reason to prioritize improving people's lives through science is the pressing need for environmental sustainability. Scientific research and innovation are vital for addressing climate change, resource depletion, and pollution — issues that directly impact the well-being of current and future generations. Innovations such asInnovations like renewable energy technologies, efficient waste management, and sustainable agriculture practices are essential for preserving the planet for future generations.
In conclusion, the central aim of science should indeed be the betterment of human lives. Science has consistently demonstrated its capacity to prolong life, alleviate suffering, and address pressing global challenges. And it still has a lot to contribute. It should, therefore, playIt, should, therefore, play an indispensable role in advancing health, promoting environmental sustainability, and enhancing the overall quality of life.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response maintains a decisive position and develops two relevant lines of argument with clear progression, strong topic vocabulary, and varied sentence structures. Its main limitation is that the environmental argument is briefer and less fully explained than the medical argument, while a few awkward constructions and punctuation choices reduce precision. Develop the second main idea with a concrete causal example and edit complex sentences for more natural phrasing.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response directly answers the question with a consistent position and supports it through relevant arguments about health and sustainability.
Extend the environmental argument with a specific example showing how one scientific innovation improves people's lives.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay progresses logically from its position through two distinct supporting arguments to a concise conclusion, with well-managed cohesion.
Strengthen balance by developing the shorter second body paragraph to a depth comparable with the first.
Lexical Resource
A broad, topic-specific vocabulary communicates sophisticated ideas effectively, despite a few strained collocations and repetitions.
Use more natural phrasing in expressions such as 'immense possibility towards contributions' and reduce repeated words such as 'compelling'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses varied complex structures with a high level of accuracy and only occasional local errors.
Edit punctuation in complex clauses, especially removing the unnecessary commas around 'should' in the final sentence.