In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Sample Response
It is common practice for urban planners to segregate residential, commercial, and industrial activities into distinct zones, yet this approach has both merits and drawbacks. While single-use zoning can offer certain benefits, I believe its tendency to foster car dependency and erode street-level vitality means its disadvantages outweigh its benefits.
Single-use zoning can deliver tangible practical gains, one of which is reduced nuisance conflicts. Specifically, locating factories and entertainment venues away from residential areas cuts noise and air pollution at source. This means that industrial operations and late-night establishments generate disruptive sound and fumes that, when placed in dedicated zones, no longer intrude on family homes. As a result, quieter, cleaner neighbourhoods promote better physical and mental health among inhabitants. Furthermore, concentrating offices and shops within a central business district allows for more efficient infrastructure deployment. A clustered commercial core, for instance, can be served by a single metro hub, reducing the need for multiple transit lines. Shared demand in one area thus can lower per-capita transport costs and simplify maintenance schedules.
Despite offering certain organizational advantages, the spatial separation of urban functions often incurs hidden social and environmental costs which can overshadow the mentioned benefits. From an ecological perspective, the fragmentation of residential, commercial, and workplace zones compels individuals to rely heavily on private vehicles, even for routine errands. This dependency stems from the long distances between homes, offices, and shops, which significantly increase traffic volumes and congestion, particularly during rush hours. Socially, this model also diminishes the vibrancy of urban life. The lack of diverse, overlapping activities undermines street vitality and weakens community bonds. For example, suburban office parks often become deserted after business hours, transforming once-active spaces into ghost towns by evening. In the absence of continuous foot traffic from both residents and businesses, local enterprises suffer, and residents lose opportunities for organic social interaction.
In conclusion, although segregating urban functions can alleviate pollution conflicts and streamline transit planning, the resulting car dependency and lifeless streets ultimately do more harm than good. A more integrated, mixed-use approach would better balance efficiency with vibrant, sustainable community life.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Remove overlap Original: tangible practical gains Suggested revision: practical gains Why it matters: Tangible and practical overlap in meaning, so one modifier is sufficient.
- 2. Improve the collocation Original: reduced Suggested revision: fewer Why it matters: Conflicts are countable, so fewer is the more natural modifier.
- 3. Clarify the link Original: This means that Suggested revision: In practice, Why it matters: This transition connects the explanation to the example more directly.
- 4. Choose precise wording Original: sound Suggested revision: noise Why it matters: Noise is the more precise term for unwanted sound in this context.
- 5. Use natural collocation Original: deployment Suggested revision: provision Why it matters: Provision is more idiomatic for supplying public infrastructure.
- 6. Place adverb naturally Original: thus can lower Suggested revision: can thus lower Why it matters: Placing thus after the modal produces a more natural formal word order.
- 7. Use clear reference Original: the mentioned benefits Suggested revision: these benefits Why it matters: The demonstrative gives a smoother and more direct reference to the preceding advantages.
- 8. Remove redundant linker Original: this model also diminishes Suggested revision: this model diminishes Why it matters: Socially already signals the shift, so also adds unnecessary connective weight.
- 9. Clarify the time contrast Original: once-active spaces Suggested revision: active daytime spaces Why it matters: This wording makes clear that the spaces were active earlier in the day rather than in the distant past.
- 10. Use precise wording Original: organic Suggested revision: spontaneous Why it matters: Spontaneous states the intended unplanned nature of the interaction more precisely.
- 11. Sentence rewrite Original: While single-use zoning can offer certain benefits, I believe its tendency to foster car dependency and erode street-level vitality means its disadvantages outweigh its benefits. Suggested revision: While single-use zoning can offer certain benefits, I believe that it fosters car dependency and erodes street-level vitality, meaning that its disadvantages outweigh its benefits. Why it matters: The rewrite removes the awkward attachment between tendency and means while preserving the original position.
Suggested Rewrites
- tangible practical gains practical gains
- reduced fewer
- This means that In practice,
- sound noise
- deployment provision
- thus can lower can thus lower
Why this response received Band 8.5
The essay presents a compelling, fully developed comparison, with especially strong causal reasoning and specific illustrations supporting a consistent position. Its main limitation is occasional over-elaboration and a few slightly awkward formulations that soften an otherwise highly precise argument. The highest-priority improvement is to tighten selected explanatory sentences and ensure every example remains explicitly tied to the exact planning policy described in the task.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response fully answers the comparative question through a clear position and thoroughly developed benefits and drawbacks.
Strengthen the already sophisticated argument by tying the infrastructure example more explicitly to separated land uses.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument is highly coherent, with controlled paragraphing and clear progression from benefits to more consequential drawbacks.
Trim a small amount of repeated causal explanation so the progression remains maximally concise.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is broad, precise, and flexible, particularly in the discussion of planning, environmental costs, and community life.
Replace slightly awkward phrases such as 'the mentioned benefits' with more natural, exact alternatives.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex sentence forms are varied and consistently well controlled, with only very minor lapses in natural phrasing.
Refine occasional word order, such as around 'thus can lower,' to make every complex sentence fully idiomatic.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.