Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
This response is estimated at Band 7.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Some people argue that teachers should be responsible for helping students distinguishguiding students to distinguish right from wrong, while others believe that teachers should focus only on academic subjects. In my opinion, while academic instructioneducation is important, teachers also have a role in moral guidance.
On the one hand, academic instruction is the primary purpose of schoolsacademic learning is the main purpose of schools. Teachers are trained to teach subjects such as mathematics, science, and languagessubjects like mathematics, science, and languages, which are essential for students’ future careers. If teachers focus too much on moral education, this may distract them from their primary roleit may distract them from their main role and reduce the time available to teach core subjectsthe time available for teaching core subjects. Furthermore, parents are usually the primary providerssource of moral values and guidance, as they know their children best.
On the other hand, schools are also a place where students spend a large part of their day, and teachers can play a vital role in shaping their behavior. Lessons on teamwork, honesty, and responsibility can help children develop good habits and social skills. Moreover, not all parents have the ability or time to teach moral values effectively, so teachers can fill this gap.
In conclusion, I believe that a combination of academic teaching and moral guidance is ideal. While the primary focus should remain academicmain focus should remain on academics, teachers should also help students develop ethical behavior to prepare them for life in society.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response is strongest in its clear, balanced organisation and consistently controlled language, with both views and the writer's position easy to follow. Its main limitation is that, at 218 words, the arguments remain fairly general and receive little detailed support. The highest-priority improvement is to extend each main idea with a specific example or fuller explanation while maintaining the concise structure.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both views and a clear opinion are addressed, but the under-length response develops its relevant ideas only briefly and generally.
Add specific examples or consequences to substantiate each side and meet the expected length.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response progresses logically through clearly focused paragraphs, with cohesive devices used appropriately though somewhat conventionally.
Use more varied transitions between supporting points so the progression feels less formulaic.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is appropriate and sufficiently varied, with effective choices such as moral guidance, core subjects, and ethical behavior.
Develop greater precision by replacing general phrases such as good habits and social skills with more context-specific wording.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A good range of simple and complex structures is used accurately, with punctuation and sentence control consistently secure.
Refine the range further by integrating supporting detail through more varied subordinate and participial structures.