The news is an important source of knowledge for all of us about the world, especially in this era of technology. Journalists are mainly responsible to bring this news to us but not all of them are true to their responsibilities and ethics. How much can we trust the journalists?
Sample Response
In the digital epoch, keeping oneself abreast with the outer world is first and foremost the concern of many masses. The responsibility to bring facts about any incidents lies with the reporters; however, some are observed negligent about their duties and moral code. The reasons that make us believe in them will be discussed below, along with fine examples.
To commence with, Firstly, due to some distrust columnist, it cannot be inferred that they should not be believed. There are others who put their lives in danger and collect evidence from unmasking many people. They do maintain the reputation of their profession as well as the trust of people. Resultantly, we can believe in them. For instance, many newsmen or newswomen depicted the pitiable condition of farmers, who were protesting against the government for their rights, even in extreme conditions. Even though they had been warned or stopped from showing the reality to the public, however, those newsagents regardless of the threats, provided essential stuff to the masses. Therefore, for those brave journalists, it can be said that they can be trusted without question.
Moreover, there is no other option to get indispensable information except columnist. They will always bring reality to the people for the popularity of their channels. They know that today’s masses are literate and rational. They will be believed only if they do something different from their other counterparts. So, due to tough competition in mass media, journalists try to come to the expectations of common people. They are rewarded by the multitude for their work as a loyal servant of a community. To exemplify it, nowadays, it has been seen that news is distorted, and the truth is hidden from the naked eyes of human beings. But, when the other news reporter discloses the truth about a piece of particular news, which has been presented before with some false pieces of evidence, people automatically build their confidence in them. That’s why this trend to expose others and establish one’s rapport is advantageous for the laymen. People can compare the information and logically get the authentic information.
To conclude, in consideration of the above analysis, it is ostensible that masses can trust reporters as much as they can owing to their dedication to make people familiar with the truth even by putting their life at risk. Besides, tough competition among news agencies is beneficial for the masses to evaluate genuineness.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Correct the collocation Original: keeping oneself abreast with the outer world Suggested revision: keeping oneself abreast of events in the wider world Why it matters: Abreast takes of, and events in the wider world expresses the intended meaning naturally.
- 2. Use natural noun phrase Original: the concern of many masses Suggested revision: a concern for many people Why it matters: Masses is unnatural for referring neutrally to many individuals in this context.
- 3. Remove faulty determiner Original: any incidents Suggested revision: incidents Why it matters: Any is unnecessary and clashes with the general plural reference.
- 4. Fix adjective construction Original: are observed negligent Suggested revision: are negligent Why it matters: Observed cannot directly introduce the adjective negligent in this construction.
- 5. Remove duplicate linker Original: To commence with, Firstly, Suggested revision: To begin with, Why it matters: The two opening linkers perform the same function and should not be combined.
- 6. Fix noun phrase Original: some distrust columnist Suggested revision: some untrustworthy columnists Why it matters: The phrase needs an adjective before a plural count noun.
- 7. Use standard transition Original: Resultantly Suggested revision: As a result Why it matters: This is the more natural connective for presenting the consequence.
- 8. Use concise term Original: newsmen or newswomen Suggested revision: journalists Why it matters: Journalists is more concise and appropriately inclusive.
- 9. Fix exception phrase Original: except columnist Suggested revision: other than from journalists Why it matters: The exception requires a preposition and a plural noun for the general reference.
- 10. Use precise expression Original: bring reality to the people Suggested revision: report the truth to the public Why it matters: The original collocation is unnatural and obscures the intended claim.
- 11. Express purpose clearly Original: for the popularity of their channels Suggested revision: to increase their channels’ popularity Why it matters: The infinitive clearly expresses the purpose of reporting the truth.
- 12. Remove redundancy Original: their other counterparts Suggested revision: their counterparts Why it matters: Counterparts already means other people or organisations in a comparable role.
Suggested Rewrites
- keeping oneself abreast with the outer world keeping oneself abreast of events in the wider world
- the concern of many masses a concern for many people
- any incidents incidents
- are observed negligent are negligent
- To commence with, Firstly, To begin with,
- some distrust columnist some untrustworthy columnists
Why this response received Band 6.5
The response maintains a clear position and develops two relevant reasons for trusting journalists, supported by extended examples. Its main limitation is that the argument is overly absolute and does not adequately define when trust is justified, while frequent awkward word choices and grammatical errors reduce precision. The highest-priority improvement is to present a more qualified judgement based on verification, evidence, and journalistic accountability.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The question is addressed with a clear position and relevant supporting ideas, though the judgement about trust is insufficiently qualified.
Explain the conditions under which journalists should be trusted and acknowledge how readers can evaluate unreliable reporting.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay has clear paragraph-level progression, but some linking is mechanical, repetitive, or logically imprecise.
Use fewer formulaic connectors and make the relationship between each claim, example, and conclusion more explicit.
Lexical Resource
The writer attempts a broad vocabulary, but frequent inappropriate collocations and word choices reduce naturalness and precision.
Prefer accurate, familiar expressions such as journalists, reliable information, and meet expectations over forced or unsuitable alternatives.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mix of simple and complex structures communicates the main ideas, despite recurring errors in articles, agreement, plurals, and clause construction.
Review sentence boundaries and dependent-clause patterns, especially constructions that combine even though with however.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
The news is an important source of knowledge for all of us about the world, especially in this era of technology. Journalists are mainly responsible to bring this news to us but not all of them are true to their responsibilities and ethics. How much can we trust the journalists?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.