Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The question of whether or not states should be self-sufficient in food production has long been the centre of intense debate, with some believing that countries should produce all their food themselvesall foodstuff themselves. Personally, I do not believe states can or should be self-sufficientcould and should be self-sufficient, since although this can have some positive economic effectseffect for example, a positive trade balancee.g. a positive trade balance, it can also bring with it the risk of faminethe instability of famines.
Firstly, a country producing its own food has the benefit of reducing the amount it spends on imports, which has a positive economic effecta positive effect economically in the long term. This is a majorhuge consideration in nation-states that are still importing more than they are exporting, because money is flowing out of the countryfor money is technically flowing out of the country. This is why countries such as the USA, despite being the most powerful country in the world economically, still rely on a strong agricultural industry in order to keep their trade balance.
On the other hand, domestic food productionfood self-production can often lead to famines, for weather conditions can determine the success of a harvestmake or break a harvest. In the past, when countries grew their own crops and international trade was far less extensiveinternational trade was far lower, famines were much more frequent as there was more risk involved: a season of bad weather would mean a famine that could last year-round. Importing food from a variety of countries would minimize the risk posedincurred by fluctuating weather patterns, since risks to crops are more geographically spread out.
Overall, I argue that though there are economic benefits to having a country making its own food, the nature of the modern globalized economy means that in the long run, countries might find it much more beneficial to import their food from overseas.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its clear, nuanced position and its logical comparison of economic gains with the greater risk posed by dependence on domestic harvests. The main limitation is occasional imprecision in wording and a slightly broad conclusion that promotes overseas imports rather than the more carefully argued strategy of diversified sourcing. The highest priority is to preserve that qualification consistently in the thesis, evidence, and conclusion.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The essay directly answers the question with a clear position and develops both the economic benefit and food-security risk in depth.
Make the conclusion endorse diversified imports explicitly so it matches the precise solution established in the second body paragraph.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument progresses naturally from concession to rebuttal, with effective paragraphing and well-controlled referencing.
Strengthen the final link by echoing the geographical diversification point rather than introducing the broader idea of overseas food.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is flexible and topic-specific, though phrases such as food self-production and the instability of famines are not fully natural.
Choose more idiomatic terms such as domestic food production and vulnerability to famine.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses varied complex structures accurately, and the great majority of sentences are error-free.
Edit the few awkward noun and participle patterns, especially all foodstuff and having a country making its own food.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.