Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
As younger generationsthe younger generations struggle to find jobsstruggle to apply for jobs, they begin to wonder if holding interviews is the best way to assess candidates. I partlymoderately agree that in some cases, interviews are not the best method.
There are many reasons why people are skeptical about using interviews to assess candidates’ suitabilityexamine candidates’ qualities. Firstly, an interview does not fully reflect candidates’ abilities, especially those applyingespecially for candidates applying to technical positions in the IT and engineering industries. For these positions, the best way to assess their abilities is through tests, such as programming tests, case studies, or group-work assessments with other candidatesteamwork sessions with other candidates. Secondly, it is hard to evaluate candidates through interviews because they can lie. Many people admitadmitted to having lied at least once, especially when asked about their past experiences or projects. For example, many told recruiters that they significantly contributed to projects in which they barely participatedprojects that they hardly participated in.
However, I still think that recruiters should combine interviews with other assessment methodscombine interviews with other evaluations because interviews remain efficientbecause they are still efficient. The first advantage is that anthe interview gives both employers and applicants a chance to see if applicants are suitable for the company’s culture. For example, employers can observe candidates’ manners, dress, or attitudesmanners, dress codes, or attitudes, whereas candidates can see how other workers are treated. Another advantage of interviews is that they are quick and easy to conduct. Most employers will spend only 30 minutes interviewing candidates before usually giving a tour around the workplace. This is also the most direct way to communicate with applicants because both parties can discuss sensitive topics that otherwise would be inappropriate to touch on, such as salary, benefits, or workplace culture.
In conclusion, I agree that for technology companies, using only interviews as an assessment during their hiring process is not sufficient. However, recruiters should not eliminate or replace interviews.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response is strongest when it presents a balanced, clearly organized case for retaining interviews alongside practical assessments, supported by relevant workplace examples. Its main limitation is that the position shifts from a broad moderate agreement to a narrower conclusion about technology companies, weakening precision. The priority is to define the scope of the judgement consistently and develop each reason in direct relation to that position.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response addresses the issue, presents a qualified position, and supports both the limitations and continuing value of interviews with relevant explanations and examples.
Keep the final judgement aligned with the essay’s broader scope instead of narrowing it mainly to technology companies.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument is easy to follow, with clear paragraph purposes and logical movement from criticisms of interviews to reasons for retaining them.
Use less mechanical enumeration and strengthen the logical bridge between interview efficiency and the separate benefit of assessing cultural fit.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is sufficiently varied and generally precise for the topic, although several choices and collocations sound slightly awkward or repetitive.
Use more natural expressions for evaluating qualities, candidates’ appearance, and discussing sensitive subjects, while reducing repeated references to interviews and candidates.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The essay uses a good range of complex structures with generally accurate control, and the occasional awkward construction does not impede meaning.
Review tense choice in general statements and streamline heavily modified sentences so their grammatical relationships remain fully natural.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.