The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

Same questionCompare 3 different answers (Band 6–6.5)
Same-task comparison

This response is estimated at Band 6.0. Can you write a better one?

Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.

  • Closest to official scores
  • What to fix on each criterion
  • Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Start writing this task

Sample Response

1

The table shows information about the percentage of consumer spending on three3 kinds of goods and services across five countriesover 5 countries in 2002in the year of 2002.

2

Overall,the figures for food/drinks/tobacco represented the highest expenditurewere the largest items in all countries compared with the other two categoriescompared with other two goods,while the proportion of leisure/educationLE was the lowestwas the least item in these countries.

3

In 2002, spending accounted forIn 2002 ,accounted for 32.14% of the consumption of food/drinks/tobacco in Turkey,while the figure for Ireland stood at almost 29%while the figure for Ireland at almost 29%.Turkey also had the largest proportion of leisure/education,at 4.35%.In contrast,the spending onof clothing/footwear in Italy was at 9%,higher than that in the other four nationshigher than other four nations.

4

The lowest proportions of food/drinks/tobacco and clothing/footwear were in Sweden,at 15.77% and 5.4%.The figures in Spain were higher thanThe figures in Spain higher than SwedenSwede,; however, Spainhowever Spain had the lowestleast proportion of leisure/education,only at 1.98%.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 6.0

文章成功包含了概述并涵盖了图表中的主要数据对比,能够较好地完成图表描述任务。然而,字数略低于要求,且文章中存在数处明显的语法结构错误(如缺少主语、主谓不完整)和标点格式问题。优先改进语法结构的完整性与准确性,同时扩充细节描述以满足字数要求,将有助于显著提升表现。

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

TA

任务完成度

6.0
Scoring rule

文章给出了清晰的总体趋势概述,并对各个国家和消费类别的关键数据进行了对比与总结,但总字数略低于最低要求。

Next step

适当增加对个别数据细节或国家间差异的对比分析,确保字数稳妥达到150字以上。

CC

连贯与衔接

6.0
Scoring rule

文章段落分明,信息推进逻辑基本清晰,使用了恰当的衔接词来进行对比。

Next step

注意标点符号后的空格使用,并尝试使用更多样化的逻辑连接手段使衔接更加自然流畅。

LR

词汇资源

6.0
Scoring rule

词汇使用基本能够满足图表描述的需求,表达了正确的数据含义,但存在少量用词不当或缩写不规范的情况。

Next step

避免使用未经说明的首字母缩写(如 LE),并注意国名与国家居民拼写的准确性(如 Sweden 与 Swede)。

GRA

语法多样性与准确性

5.0
Scoring rule

能够运用简单句和部分复合句,但句子结构错误较为频繁,出现了缺失主语和谓语动词的情况。

Next step

检查并纠正缺失主语的句式(如 In 2002, accounted for...)以及缺失系动词的结构,确保句法结构完整。