The charts below show the number of working hours per week in the industrial sector in four European countries in 2002.
This response is estimated at Band 6.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
The four bar charts illustrate the number of working hours per week in the industrial sector in four European countries in 2002.
Overall, the percentagepercentege of workers in the four countries workingthe workers in four countries worked about 36-40 hours per week was almost the highest, except in France. Denmark had the lowestleast percentage of working 46-50 hours per week, while the UK had the highest proportionproprotion of working over 50 hours per week.
In Sweden, employees who worked about 36-40 hours per week accounted for 80% of the industrial workforceThe workers who worked about 36-40 hours per week in Sweden accounted for 80%, followed by the figure of approximately 69% in Denmark69 in Danmark. These figuresAnd the figures in the two countries were much higher than those in FranceFance and the UK; the formerthe UK, the former was nearly 39%, the latter was 50%. Except in France, working for 36-40 hours per week was the most common working-hour bandmost common choice. In France, working for 31-35 hours accounted for around 39%, around 3 percentage points highernearly 4 percentage points higher than the figure for 36-40 hours.
The workers who worked over 50 hours per week in the UK was the highest among the four countriesaccounted for the highest among the four countries. This category accounted for around 20%It accounted for 20%, nearly twice the figure for the other countries. In addition, Denmark hadBesides, Denmark had the lowest share of working 46-50 hours per week, only accountingaccouting for 10%, approximately half the figure for the other countries.
Why this response received Band 6.0
The essay effectively identifies key trends and provides a clear overview comparing working hours across the four European nations. Its main limitation stems from frequent spelling mistakes and grammatical punctuation errors, such as comma splices. Prioritizing accurate word spelling and refining clause connection will significantly elevate the overall clarity and precision.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Achievement
The response presents an overview and highlights key comparisons across the four countries, though some minor numerical interpretations could be clearer.
Ensure all key comparisons and proportions directly mirror the visual data without overgeneralizing minor categories.
Coherence and Cohesion
The information is organized logically across distinct paragraphs with broad overall coherence.
Vary cohesive transitions between comparisons to make the flow between details feel more natural rather than repetitive.
Lexical Resource
An adequate vocabulary range is used to describe percentages and categories, but noticeable spelling errors recur.
Carefully proofread the response to eliminate spelling mistakes in key vocabulary and country names.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mix of simple and complex structures is attempted, but comma splices and minor grammatical inaccuracies are present.
Use appropriate conjunctions or semicolons instead of commas to link independent clauses correctly.