The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
Sample Response
The table presentstabular graph elucidates the four indicators in Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994, as shown by United Nations statisticsUnited Statistics. The figures are given inThe data is calibrated into percentages, US dollars, and numbers.
Overall, it is crystal clear that there was the highest annual incomea maximum trend of earning in Japan, whereas Zaire had the lowest adult literacy ratethe minimum experienced by Zaire was the literacy rate amongst adults.
Looking at the detailsLooking into the whole details, 11100 US dollars have been earned by the Canadian population every year. Likewise, Japan recorded a much higher annual income per persona huge number of salaries were noticed in Japan, which was 15760 USD, the highest figure among the four countriesthe peak point in the given period. In comparison, Peru's annual income per person was 160 dollars160 dollars were proceeds in the Peru nation. Zaire’s income level was 30 dollars lower than Peru'sdecreased by 30 dollars compared to the former country. However, the life expectancy at birth in Canada was 76, which was two years higherrose by a tiny fraction in Japan. By contrastApart from it, in the other two nations, life expectancy was 51 years in Peru and 47 years in Zaireit was reduced by one-third and one-third respectively in 1994.
Turning to further details, the transformation of calories in daily routine to every person with a high number of calories in Canada, which was observed at 3326, sharply declined by 5126 in Japan, which touched 2846. After that, there was a negligible difference between Peru and Zaire in the supply of calories. Interestingly, adult literacy ratesthe trend of literacy skills amongst adults was identicalalmost similar in the first two countries, at 99%. Last but not least, it turned twice, plumping from 99%to 45% of what was revealed by United Nations statistics in 1994.
Why this response received Band 5.5
The response is organised into an introduction, overview, and grouped details, and it reports several income and calorie figures correctly. Its main weakness is unreliable selection and interpretation of the data: the overview is narrow, several comparisons are vague, and the calorie difference and final literacy figures are inaccurate. Prioritise identifying the dominant cross-country pattern and checking every number and comparison against the table.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Achievement
The response addresses all four indicators and includes an overview, but key trends are insufficiently summarised and several details are inaccurate or unclear.
State the broad contrast between Canada and Japan and Peru and Zaire, then verify the exact calorie and literacy figures before comparing them.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response uses clear paragraph divisions and a generally recognisable sequence, although some referencing and transitions make relationships between figures difficult to follow.
Group comparisons by indicator and use direct country names instead of vague references such as the former country or the other two nations.
Lexical Resource
There is some range in vocabulary, but frequent inappropriate collocations such as trend of earning and transformation of calories reduce precision.
Prefer standard data-reporting language such as annual income, calorie supply, stood at, and was higher or lower than.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mixture of sentence forms is attempted, but recurring agreement, article, clause, and comparison errors weaken clarity.
Use shorter comparative sentences with controlled subjects and verbs, and check that every clause is grammatically complete.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Academic Writing Task 1
The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.