The tables show the average hours worked by part-time and full-time men and women in three European countries in 2002 and the European average.

Same questionCompare 2 different answers (Band 6–7)
Same-task comparison

This response is estimated at Band 6.0. Can you write a better one?

Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.

  • Closest to official scores
  • What to fix on each criterion
  • Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Start writing this task

Sample Response

1

The two tables illustrate the average hours worked by part-time and full-time men and women in three European countries in 2002 and the European average.

2

Overall, the full-time workers in Greece worked the most hours among the Netherlands, the UK, and the European averageamong Netherlands, UK and European avarage, while the full-time working hours in the UK werein UK was the lowest. In addition, theBesides, the European average part-time working hours rankedrank the highest among other three countries.

3

Men with a full-time job in Greece worked for the longest time, 42.5 hoursnearly 42.5 hours. This figure was much higher than 38 hours in the Netherlands and 37.5 hours in the UKin Netherlands and 37.5 hours in UK. Besides, hours for full-time workers in UK, no matter men or women, were the lowest. Women there worked only 37 hoursThe women there only need work 37 hours, 2.2 hours less than the European averageavarage.

4

Also, working hours for part-time workers in the UK stood outin UK stood out among othersohters. The women worked onlyonly need to work 28 hours, 6 hours fewersignificantly 6 hours less than the European average and over 1 hour less than the hours in Greece and the NetherlandsNetherland. Furthermore, the averageavaerage number of hours for part-time male workers in Netherlands was the lowest. It only stood at 28.3 hours, even 0.7 hourshour less than the figure in UK. This was also the only instanceAnd this was the only situation when men worked less than women.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 6.0

The response effectively presents key features from both tables and provides a clear overview highlighting main trends. However, spelling errors and awkward phrasing lower the linguistic clarity. To improve, focus on eliminating basic spelling mistakes and refining complex sentence structures.

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

TA

Task Achievement

6.0
Scoring rule

Key trends and specific data points for full-time and part-time workers are accurately described and compared across all categories.

Next step

Ensure all main trends in the overview are expressed clearly without repetitive phrasing.

CC

Coherence and Cohesion

6.0
Scoring rule

The text is logically organized into paragraph structure with clear central topics, though some transition signals are used repetitively.

Next step

Vary cohesive devices and linking expressions between paragraphs to create a smoother flow.

LR

Lexical Resource

6.0
Scoring rule

A good variety of task-appropriate vocabulary is used, but repeated spelling errors noticeable throughout reduce precision.

Next step

Proofread carefully to fix frequent spelling typos like 'avarage', 'ohters', and 'avaerage'.

GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

6.0
Scoring rule

A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is attempted with good control overall, despite occasional minor grammatical inaccuracies.

Next step

Pay attention to correct verb patterns, preposition choices, and singular/plural noun agreement after numerical values.