Some people say that animals should not be exploited for the benefit of human beings unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sample Response
In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the exploitation of animals for human benefit. There are individuals who contend that animals should not be utilized for human benefit unless it can be proven that they are not subjected to any form of suffering. In my opinion, I agree with this statement, and believe that we should make every effort to ensure that animals are not subjected to unnecessary suffering.
Firstly, animals have the ability to experience pain and suffering, and it is our moral responsibility to ensure that we do not cause them any unnecessary harm. The use of animals in scientific research, entertainment, and agriculture industries, for example, can result in the mistreatment and exploitation of these creatures. It is important to ensure that animals are not subjected to cruel treatment and that their well-being is taken into account.
Secondly, there are now numerous alternatives to animal testing and exploitation that can be just as effective, if not more so. In the field of scientific research, for example, computer simulations and other non-animal methods can be used to test the safety and efficacy of drugs and other products. These alternatives are not only more humane but also more cost-effective and often produce more accurate results. Similarly, in the cosmetics industry, animal testing has been a common practice for many years, leading to the mistreatment and exploitation of countless animals. However, with the advancement of technology, alternative testing methods have been developed, such as 3D skin models and computer simulations, which are just as effective and do not require the use of animals.
However, there are some situations where the use of animals may be necessary, such as in cases where human lives are at risk or where there are no alternatives available. For example, in medical emergencies, animal testing may be necessary to develop life-saving treatments.
In conclusion, while there may be situations where the use of animals is necessary, we must ensure that we do not exploit them unnecessarily or subject them to suffering. We should strive to find alternatives to animal testing and exploitation wherever possible, and ensure that animals are treated with the respect and compassion they deserve.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use concise phrasing Original: There are individuals who contend that Suggested revision: Some people argue that Why it matters: The revision expresses the same idea more directly.
- 2. Remove repetition Original: In my opinion, I agree Suggested revision: I agree Why it matters: The two expressions perform the same function, so using both is redundant.
- 3. Remove unnecessary comma Original: statement, and believe Suggested revision: statement and believe Why it matters: The coordinated verbs share the same subject, so a comma is not needed before 'and'.
- 4. Use a direct verb Original: have the ability to experience Suggested revision: can experience Why it matters: The modal verb conveys ability more concisely.
- 5. Fix list structure Original: scientific research, entertainment, and agriculture industries Suggested revision: scientific research, entertainment, and agriculture Why it matters: The plural noun 'industries' does not combine naturally with every item in this list.
- 6. Maintain precise reference Original: these creatures Suggested revision: animals Why it matters: Repeating the key noun is clearer and more neutral than switching to an emotive substitute.
- 7. Clarify the category Original: numerous alternatives to animal testing and exploitation Suggested revision: numerous alternatives to using animals Why it matters: The revised phrase covers both testing and other forms of animal use without treating exploitation as a technical method.
- 8. Use natural phrasing Original: with the advancement of technology Suggested revision: with advances in technology Why it matters: The plural phrase is the more idiomatic way to refer to multiple technological developments.
- 9. Remove wordiness Original: such as in cases where Suggested revision: for example, when Why it matters: The revision introduces the condition more concisely.
- 10. Remove unnecessary comma Original: wherever possible, and ensure Suggested revision: wherever possible and ensure Why it matters: The coordinated verbs 'strive' and 'ensure' share the subject 'we', so the comma is unnecessary.
- 11. Sentence rewrite Original: These alternatives are not only more humane but also more cost-effective and often produce more accurate results. Suggested revision: These alternatives are not only more humane and cost-effective but also capable of producing more accurate results. Why it matters: The rewrite gives the 'not only...but also' construction parallel grammatical elements.
- 12. Consolidate similar examples Suggested revision: Present scientific research and cosmetics as two concise examples under one clear claim about non-animal methods, avoiding repeated statements about simulations and effectiveness. Why it matters: Consolidating the parallel examples would reduce repetition and sharpen the paragraph's progression.
Suggested Rewrites
- There are individuals who contend that Some people argue that
- In my opinion, I agree I agree
- statement, and believe statement and believe
- have the ability to experience can experience
- scientific research, entertainment, and agriculture industries scientific research, entertainment, and agriculture
- these creatures animals
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its clear, qualified position and its logically developed case for humane alternatives to animal use. Its main limitation is that several claims and examples repeat the same point, while the exception for life-saving research is treated briefly; the highest-priority improvement is to define more rigorously when animal use could be justified and develop that qualification with comparable depth.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response directly answers the question, maintains a clear qualified position, and develops relevant moral, practical, and exceptional considerations.
Develop the proposed exception in greater depth by setting clear conditions for when animal use might be ethically permissible.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument is easy to follow, with purposeful paragraphing and smooth progression from principle to alternatives, qualification, and conclusion.
Reduce repetition between the research and cosmetics examples so that each paragraph advances a distinct part of the reasoning.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is wide, appropriately academic, and generally precise, although key terms such as exploitation, suffering, and alternatives recur frequently.
Use more varied and discriminating language to distinguish harmful exploitation, regulated use, welfare safeguards, and replacement methods.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses a wide range of complex sentence forms with strong control and only minor punctuation or phrasing slips.
Polish occasional constructions such as the introductory opinion sentence by removing unnecessary commas and tightening coordination.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people say that animals should not be exploited for the benefit of human beings unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.