Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. So companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
In recent years, the role of women in society as well as in the workplacein job sectors has changed considerablychanged to a great extent. However, notably,it is noteworthy that higher positions in firms are still occupied by men, although women account for half of the workforce in many developed countries. While some people claim that women should be promoted more often into these positionswomen should be promoted more to hold these positions, I disagree with this idea as I believe that higher positions should be heldserved by deserving people and should not be allocated on the basis of genderallocated based on gender. First, recruiting for higher positions in a company should never be based on gender, but on qualifications, skills, and aptitudesbut qualifications, skills and aptitudes. This is because choosing people who cannot adapt to the working conditions will cause companies to facemake companies confront many difficulties; thisdifficulties - even this can affect profits, productivity, and public imagethe profit, productivity and the public image. For instance, in my brother’s workplace, two women were recruited for two senior positionsrecruited in two higher positions only because they were relatives of the owner. Within a few months, the management had to replace both of them with more competent employees. Therefore, a company should always choose the best-qualified candidatesthe best people to fill its important positionsserve their important positions. If a female candidate seems more promising or if an existing female employee has excellent capabilities, there should be no problem withthere should not be any problem in recruiting a woman for or promoting her to a higher positionrecruiting or promoting a woman in a higher position. Again, if percentages or numbersif percentage or number is the most crucial factor, I believe children should also be promoted to higher positions in a company in a developing country as their proportion among factory and industrial workerstheir percentage in factories and industries in those countries is also high. This exemplifies why qualifications should takeget priority over other aspects when it comes to hiring people for higher management positions in a company. In conclusion, I strongly believe that employees should be recruited according to their expertise, eligibility, and talentexpertise, eligibilities and talent. It is therefore recommended that women who want to play important roles in an organisation should acquiregain those qualifications and skills. They should not be favoured solelyonly because of their gender.
Why this response received Band 6.5
The response’s strongest feature is its firm, consistently maintained position that senior appointments should depend on merit, expressed through generally fluent and varied language. Its main limitation is that the nepotism example and comparison with child workers do not directly test the case for quotas among qualified candidates, weakening the argument’s relevance and depth. The highest-priority improvement is to engage with the rationale for quotas and rebut it using focused, credible reasoning.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear position is maintained and supported, but key examples conflate gender quotas with unqualified or nepotistic appointments and therefore only partly address the proposal.
Discuss why quotas might be proposed for qualified women, then rebut that rationale with directly relevant evidence or reasoning about fair recruitment.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument follows a broadly clear sequence, but presenting the entire response as one paragraph weakens the visible organisation of its distinct stages.
Separate the introduction, each main supporting idea, and the conclusion into purposeful paragraphs with one controlling point apiece.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is sufficiently varied and often precise, although awkward choices such as served by deserving people and the nonstandard plural eligibilities reduce naturalness.
Use more idiomatic employment collocations, such as positions filled by qualified candidates and expertise, eligibility and talent.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A good range of complex sentences is used with generally accurate control, while occasional article, preposition, and construction errors remain non-impeding.
Review complex clauses for natural complements and parallel structure, especially in sentences comparing recruitment criteria or describing appointments.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. So companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.