The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other private vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
Among the proposed solutionsIt has been recommended that out of many solutions, the best solution is to raisehike the prices of petrol and diesel to reduce environmental damageameliorate environmental hazards. I thoroughly agree with the statement because fewer vehicles will run on the road and demand for other means of transport, such as bicycles or e-rickshaws, will risedemand for other means of transport will rise such as cycles or e-rickshaws.
FirstFirst off, raising fuel pricesescalating the prices of fuel will make peoplemake the masses use their vehiclestheir types of machinery less. As a resultResultantly, there will be less pollution. To elaborate it, the paradigm shift makes people use their individual vehicles, and the emission of toxic gases from these vehicles deteriorate the air quality, and the environment gets polluted. This contaminated ambience is not suitable for residentsdwellers of any city or town. Therefore, if the prices increase, people will use their vehicles lesspeople will not run their vehicles. They will not enhance their financial burden, such as the money they have saved for eating outside, paying for gym facilities, and throwing parties. They will need to cut their expenses to refuel their vehiclesrefuel their cars or any vehicle. So, it is good to raise the prices of conventional fuel.
In addition, increasing fuel prices will encourage the use of other forms of transportassist in using other vehicles, which have no harmfulcarcinogenic effect on the environment. In other words, people will use bicycles or E-rickshaws. These two modes will be conducive to reducing the financial burden of individuals and keeping them physically fitas fit as a fiddle. These modesmodels do not create pollution, and people are less likely to suffer from various ailmentspeople fall less victim to many ailments. Earlier, a cyclist was considered destitute compared with a car ownera destitute one over a car owner. As of now, the scenario has changed. Currently, people are praisedpeople are awarded and appreciated for becoming environmentalists. Riding a cycle or using an electronic rickshaw produces no carbon emissionshas no carbon emission and is safer to use. Consequently, the surroundings will not become unhealthy, and masses will be hale and hearty.
To conclude, considering the above analysis, it is ostensible that rising fuel prices will reduce the number of vehicles on the road and the need to use environmentally-friendly vehicles will increase. It will be helpful for the atmosphere and people.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response is strongest in its clear agreement, straightforward organization, and sustained explanation of how higher fuel prices could reduce private-vehicle use. Its main limitation is that it assumes this policy is the best solution without weighing it against alternatives, while frequent unnatural word choices reduce precision. The highest-priority improvement is to justify the comparative claim directly and express the supporting ideas in more natural, exact language.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The position is clear and both main reasons are developed, but the claim that fuel-price increases are the best solution is not critically established.
Compare fuel pricing with at least one plausible environmental measure and explain why the proposed policy would be more effective overall.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas are arranged in a logical four-paragraph structure, although some linking is mechanical and several supporting sentences repeat the same consequence.
Use fewer formulaic transitions and organize each body paragraph around a concise claim, mechanism, and outcome.
Lexical Resource
The response shows a broad vocabulary, but frequent inaccurate or unnatural choices such as “types of machinery,” “carcinogenic effect,” and “ostensible” weaken precision.
Prioritize natural topic-specific collocations such as “private vehicles,” “zero-emission transport,” and “it is clear” over conspicuous but imprecise alternatives.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A variety of simple and complex sentences is generally controlled, with some agreement, reference, and construction errors that rarely obstruct meaning.
Check subject-verb agreement and revise awkward verb patterns, especially in sentences describing emissions, vehicle use, and the effects of price rises.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other private vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.