Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than building a large collection of printed books. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
Libraries have long been revered as repositories of knowledge, providing access to a wide range of printed books. However, with the rise of digital technology, there is a growing debate about whether libraries should prioritise investment in their technological resourcesprioritise improving their technological resources over building extensive collections of printed books. This essay will argue against this view, asserting that while technological resources are important, libraries should continue to value physical books and continue investing in themvalue and invest in physical books.
Printed books have stood the test of time and remain a vital part of our cultural heritage. They offer a tangible and immersive reading experience that cannot be replicated by digital formats. For many people, the smell, feel, and weight of a book make reading more enjoyable and engagingcontribute to the joy of reading and enhance the overall reading experience. Moreover, printed books serve as historical artefactsartifacts and cultural symbols, preserving the wisdom and creativity of previous generations. For instance, consider rare manuscripts or first editions of literary classics found in prestigious libraries around the world. These valuable and often fragile books not only hold literary significance but also serve as a source of inspiration for researchers, scholars, and book lovers.
While technology plays a crucial role in modern society, relying solely on technological resources in libraries can create significant drawbackscan have limitations and potential drawbacks. Firstly, digital resources are subject to rapid technological change and obsolescencetechnological advancements and obsolescence. As technology rapidly evolves, formats and platforms change, rendering certain digital resources inaccessible or incompatible with newer systems. This creates a risk that libraries may loseThis poses a risk of losing valuable information and resources over time. Furthermore, access to technology is not universal. Many communities, particularly in developing regions or rural areas, still face limited internet connectivity and lack the necessary devices to access digital resources. By prioritizing technology, libraries risk creating a digital divide, excluding those who lack access to digital platforms or familiarity with themdo not have access to or familiarity with digital platforms.
In conclusion, while technological resources play an important role in librarieshave their place in libraries, focusing solely on improving technology while neglecting large collectionsat the expense of building large collections of printed books would be a mistake. Printed books offer enduring value, cultural significance, and a unique reading experience. Moreover, relying too heavily on technology can lead to limitations and potential drawbacks, such as obsolescence and unequal access.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response presents a clear, consistent position and develops it through well-chosen arguments about cultural value, reading experience, obsolescence, and unequal access. Its main limitation is that the opposing case for technological investment is acknowledged only briefly, which reduces the depth of evaluation. The highest-priority improvement is to engage more directly with the benefits of technology before explaining why a balanced investment strategy remains preferable.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The position is direct and fully maintained, with relevant, well-developed reasons and examples addressing the proposed priority for technology.
Develop the concession about technological benefits more fully so the rejection of the proposed priority is even more critically balanced.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress logically through a clear introduction, focused body paragraphs, and a conclusion that accurately consolidates the argument.
Vary a few predictable linking patterns and tighten repeated references to value and resources for an even more seamless progression.
Lexical Resource
A wide and precise vocabulary supports nuanced discussion, including effective terms such as cultural heritage, obsolescence, and digital divide.
Reduce occasional repetition of key nouns such as resources, technology, and books by using more context-sensitive reformulation.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses a broad range of complex structures accurately, with strong control of sentence boundaries, agreement, and punctuation.
Refine a few long sentences by varying their internal structure so the grammatical range feels still more natural and economical.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than building a large collection of printed books. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.