The most common solution for criminal behaviour is prison but many believe education is a better method. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
Many feel that instead of locking up criminals, we could reduce crime more effectivelycould better reduce crime by tackling systemic problems in our educational systems. In my opinion, although education is important, deterrence remains the primary deterrent to crimeprimary inhibitor of criminality.
Many see education as a better remedy because it offers long-term promisea better remedy as it holds long-term promise. The main cause of crime is poverty and that can be linked directly to education. Take, for example,Take for example countries with strong educational systems. In Singapore, which has one of the most well-regarded school systems in the world, the majority of graduates can find well paid jobs and the crime rate is consequently among the lowest globally. There is no reasoncause to commit a crime if you have enough money to provide for yourself and your family.
Despite the clear results education can bring about, deterrence remains the main reason why people do not commit crimes. If there werewas no threat of prison, people would feel free to steal, murder or commit whatever crime they choose. A good example of the effect of prison on crime can be seen in countries with strictis in countries with strict, mandatory sentencing guidelines. Many Southeast Asian countries have imposed severe sentences on drug related crimes to successfully curb drug trafficking and distribution. There is no substitute for the clear-cutclearcut logic engendered by the threat of prison.
To sum up, despite the admitted benefits of education, the deterrentdeterring effect of prison prevents most crime. Countries ought to invest in sustainable solutions such as education and economic reform without neglectingwhile not neglecting the irreplaceable role of incarceration.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response presents a clear, consistent position and develops both education and deterrence through logically sequenced explanations and relevant examples. Its main limitation is that several claims about poverty, crime, and the preventive effect of prison are stated too absolutely, which reduces the nuance of otherwise strong reasoning. The highest-priority improvement is to qualify these causal claims and explain the conditions under which each approach is likely to work.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The position is clear throughout, and both education and imprisonment are addressed with relevant, extended support.
Qualify broad causal claims about poverty and deterrence so the argument remains convincing rather than absolute.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress logically through focused paragraphs, with cohesive devices used naturally and without overuse.
Make the relationship between the two proposed approaches even sharper by explicitly framing education as prevention and prison as deterrence.
Lexical Resource
A wide range of precise vocabulary conveys the argument fluently, with only occasional slightly overstated or awkward choices.
Prefer measured wording for claims about criminal behaviour and replace forceful abstractions with more exact causal language.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex sentence forms are varied and controlled, and the response contains very few grammatical errors.
Refine minor points of written accuracy, including compound modifiers such as well-paid and drug-related.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
The most common solution for criminal behaviour is prison but many believe education is a better method. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.