Sports which are violent, such as boxing and wrestling have no place in a civilised society and should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
In today’s world, sports play an important role in promoting fitness and discipline. However, some people believe that violent sports such as boxing and wrestlinglike boxing and wrestling should be banned because they carry a risk of physical harminvolve physical harm. While I understand their concern, I disagree with the idea of banning such sports completely.
Firstly, violent sports help people channel their aggression in a controlled, disciplined mannera controlled and disciplined way. For example, boxing teaches self-control, respect for opponents, and emotional balance. If such sports are banned, individuals who have a tendency to behave aggressivelynatural tendency toward aggression may express it in unhealthy ways, such as street fighting or criminal activitystreet fights or crime. Therefore, allowing these sports in a supervised environment may therefore reducecan actually reduce violence in society.
Second, these sportsSecondly, these sports also provide health and economic benefits. Athletes train hard, improving their fitness, strength, and mental resilience. Moreover, the sports industrysports industries generate employment and revenue for the government. By imposing strict safety measures and medical checks, the risk of serious injury can be minimised while still allowing people to enjoy these sports.
In conclusion, violent sports should not be banned but properly regulated. With the right safety rules, medical supervision, and respect for fair play, they can help people stay fit, disciplined, and positive. Rather than banning themInstead of banning, society should learn how to control and guide such activities responsibly.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response’s clearest strength is its consistent position, supported by two logically separated reasons and generally controlled language. Its main limitation is that, at 210 words, the discussion remains brief: the aggression claim is speculative and the economic point is only lightly explained. The highest priority is to extend each main idea with more precise reasoning and a credible, specific example while maintaining the clear structure.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear position is maintained and two relevant reasons are explained, but the under-length response leaves both arguments somewhat general.
Develop each reason further with precise causal explanation and a specific, credible example.
Coherence and Cohesion
The four-paragraph structure supports clear progression, and cohesive devices connect ideas logically throughout.
Use a slightly wider range of less formulaic transitions within paragraphs to make progression more natural.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is sufficiently varied and generally precise, with effective items such as “mental resilience” and “medical supervision.”
Choose more exact wording for broad claims such as aggression being channelled and industries generating government revenue.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A good range of simple and complex sentence forms is used with strong control and no meaning-impeding errors.
Refine punctuation and sentence rhythm in longer conditional and participial structures for greater polish.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Sports which are violent, such as boxing and wrestling have no place in a civilised society and should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.