Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
The utilization of the open areas for planting or building more houses has become a debatable issue. I agreeIn my opinion, I agree that trees and gardens play a vital role in human development. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view and give supporting reasons.
To begin with, planting more treesthe cultivation of more trees in urban settings benefits city dwellers in a variety of ways. For example, more shade is createdextra tree shade is generated when more trees are planted in open areas, which not only improves the city's appearancepromotes the aesthetics of the city but also helps to lower the city’s temperature. Also, this greenery provides more spaceit provides more space for older and younger peopleto elders and youngsters to engage in physical activitydo some physical activities in this relaxing environment.
Additionally, these treesplants assist in reducing urban air pollution and noise levels and promote higher living standards. Experts have discovered that tree leaves are effectivegreat absorbers, especially of carbon dioxide and dust. In addition, trees generate oxygen, which can help to reduce pollution in cities and improve air quality.
However, it is true that more housing means more places to live. But it cannot be ignored that people are suffering from urbanisation induced air pollution and the only solution to protect them is to plant more trees.
To sum up, due to mass urbanization, the need for trees and gardens has drastically increased to improve the quality of life in overcrowded cities. Moreover, trees and gardens are natural defencescombats that can help protect against various man-made disasters.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response maintains a clear position and presents a logically organised case for urban trees, with relevant explanations about shade, air quality, and public space. Its main limitation is that the competing need for housing is dismissed rather than weighed in a developed way, and several final claims become broad or imprecise. The priority is to deepen the comparison with housing while using more natural, precise expressions to support the argument.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear opinion is supported with relevant benefits of urban trees, but the housing alternative receives only brief and assertive treatment.
Develop a reasoned comparison with the need for housing and support the final claims with specific explanation.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response progresses clearly through focused paragraphs, although some linking is formulaic and a few references are vague.
Use more precise internal links between claims and ensure pronouns such as 'it' have unmistakable referents.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied enough for the topic, but several unnatural collocations reduce precision and sophistication.
Replace awkward phrases such as 'natural combats' and 'extra tree shade is generated' with natural, exact wording.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A good range of complex sentence forms is generally controlled, with only occasional non-impeding errors.
Refine article use, hyphenation, and sentence phrasing while maintaining the existing variety of structures.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.