Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not?
Sample Response
As the human populationAs human population is growing significantlyis significantly increasing every year, people's needs are growingpeople's requirements are increasing too. We need more food, more machines, more spaceplace to live and so on. As a result, people need more landmore land areas to satisfy their requirements. We cultivate and irrigate more and more landlands to growplant vegetables, build new buildings, airports, roads, etc. I think sometimes we forget that we are not alone on this planet. I disagreehave to disagree with those people who think that human needs are more important than saving land for endangered animals. I base my opinion on the following points.
First of all, as I have already mentioned, we are not alone on this planet. A few centuries ago we were part of naturethe part of wild nature. I think we need to remember this fact and respect all creatures around us. Our planetThe green planet has thousands of species and all of them have an equal right to live here freelyequal share to live here freely. If we use all the landlands for ourselvesus, it will be impossible for other species to survive. As humans, we have a responsibility to let other species live in a natural environment.
SecondlySecond of all, I believe that we all need to think aboutof the problem of overpopulation. The human population is dramatically increasing and we have to do something about it. InFrom my opinion, every family should have no more than two children. It will help to stop the growth of population, decrease human needs for farmland, housing and industry.
In conclusion, I think it is a very topical question nowadays whethernowadays that whether we, humans, have the sole ownershipsupreme possession of everything on earth. My point is that all people should answer this question and find athe solution. But as far as I am concerned, other species have as much right as we dohave to be here.
Why this response received Band 6.5
The response takes a consistent position that endangered species' land should be protected and supports it with an ethical argument about shared rights and a practical link to population pressure. Its main limitation is that the second point shifts toward family-size policy without fully explaining the land-conservation mechanism; the highest-priority improvement is to develop each reason with concrete consequences for habitats and endangered animals.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The position is clear and supported by two relevant reasons, although the overpopulation argument is only partly connected to endangered-animal habitats.
Show explicitly how reduced population growth would limit land conversion and protect a particular species or ecosystem.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay progresses logically through an introduction, two reasons, and a conclusion, though some repetition and basic sequencing are noticeable.
Use the opening sentence of each body paragraph to advance a distinct argument instead of restating earlier ideas.
Lexical Resource
There is sufficient vocabulary for population, development, species, and conservation, but several word choices and collocations lack precision.
Use natural expressions such as land, part of nature, an equal right to exist, and shared stewardship of the planet.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses a mix of sentence structures with generally clear meaning, despite recurring article, plural, preposition, and clause errors.
Proofread noun phrases for articles and countability, then check the structure of complex questions and concluding clauses.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.