Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old housing styles in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
This response is estimated at Band 7.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Many feel it is crucial that home owners possessposses the freedom to design their own houses, while others believe that architecturalarchitecture design should be restricted. In my opinion, the value of preserving the character of a local areaareas outweighsoutweights the right of property owners.
Proponents of creative freedomThose in favour of liberty argue that the freedom can inspire and motivatemotivted homeowners. When an owner has the ability to express an individual vision, they are naturally more invested in improving their property. Numerous examplesexample of this can be found in newer cities such as Shenzhen in mainland China. There is little architectural heritage to disrupt, so architects are encouraged to work with owners to pursue an aestheticaesthetically and novel design. This result is modern residential buildings and housesbuildings and offices that push the boundaries of design, and in the aggregate contribute energy and vitality that can enliven or even revitalise in some areas, like villages.
However, in the majority of communities, it is more important to prioritize cultural preservation. This is because the unique character of many cities and neighbourhoods is currently under threat from the irreversible effects of globalisation. A clear example is Tokyothe Tokyo in Japan. The government has imposed strict regulations in recent years as a growing middle class has attempted to modernize their living quartersthe living conditions. To preserve the city's historic charactercharater, guidelines require new residents to have a locally adapted architectural stylehave locally adapted architectural style, usingwith using classic wooden shutters and older building materials, while also prohibiting the demolition of typicaltypicl homes.
In conclusion, despite endeavors to allow for freedom of expression in designs, I believe that it is generally more valuable to follow and preserve historically relevantrevelant design principles.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The essay effectively presents a clear personal stance while thoroughly examining both perspectives on architectural consistency versus personal freedom. Key arguments are supported by well-chosen, real-world examples that illustrate the points clearly. To reach a higher standard, the response would benefit from tightening grammatical precision and eliminating minor spelling errors.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response fully addresses both sides of the prompt and maintains a clear, consistent position throughout.
Deepen the supporting points by explaining more explicitly how individual house styles impact local communities compared to preserved styles.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing is logical and ideas flow smoothly across the text using appropriate linking devices.
Ensure transitions between sentences within paragraphs are smooth and avoid slightly awkward phrases.
Lexical Resource
A good range of topic-specific vocabulary is used accurately to express subtle nuances.
Proofread carefully to eliminate recurring spelling slips like 'posses', 'outweights', and 'charater'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A variety of complex sentence structures is produced with good overall control.
Focus on minor grammatical accuracy, particularly regarding article usage and preposition combinations like 'with using'.