Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old housing styles in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Many feel it is crucial that home owners possess the freedom to design their own houses, while others believe that architectural design should be restricted. In my opinion, the value of preserving the character of local areas outweighs individual architectural freedom.
Proponents of creative freedom argue that such autonomy can inspire and motivate homeowners. When owners have the ability to express their individual vision, they are naturally more invested in improving their property. Numerous examples of this can be found in modern metropolisesmetropolis such as Shenzhen, Chinamainland China. Owing to the lack of architectural heritage, architects are encouraged to work with owners to pursue aesthetically pleasing and cutting-edge designsan aesthetically pleasing and cutting-edge designs. Consequently, housesThe result is houses and residential complexescomplexs that push the boundaries of design, and collectively contribute to the energy and vitality that rejuvenateenergy and vitality that can rejuvenate local areas.
However, in the majority of communities, it is more important to prioritize cultural preservation. This is because the unique character of many cities and neighbourhoods is currently under threat from the irreversible effects of globalisation. A clear example is Tokyo, Japan. The government has imposed strict regulations in recent years as a growing middle class has attempted to modernize theirthe living quarters. To preserve the city's historic character, strict guidelines apply to designatedtarget designated historic districts and traditional neighbourhoods. Within these zones, new residents must adhere to thea local architectural style, such as using classic wooden shutters and traditional building materials, while the demolition of heritage homestraditional heritage homes is banned.
In conclusion, despite arguments to allow freedom of expression in design, I believe that it is generally more valuable to follow and preserve historically significantrelevant design principles.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The essay presents a well-structured and fully developed response, offering compelling arguments for both perspectives alongside a clear personal stance. The main strength lies in the cohesive progression of ideas backed by concrete, relevant real-world examples. To refine the piece further, focus on fixing minor spelling and pluralization errors to ensure complete precision throughout.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both viewpoints are thoroughly addressed with convincing rationale and detailed examples, leading to a clearly stated position.
Ensure all illustrative examples explicitly connect back to individual house construction to maximize task relevance.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing is logical and ideas flow smoothly using a variety of effective cohesive devices.
Maintain consistent topic sentence framing in body paragraphs to make main arguments even sharper.
Lexical Resource
A wide range of sophisticated and context-appropriate vocabulary is used naturally throughout the essay.
Proofread carefully to eliminate minor spelling and morphological slips such as plural endings.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Grammatical structures are varied and complex, demonstrating high accuracy and strong control.
Continue practicing complex clause combinations while maintaining error-free execution.