Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old housing styles in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
This response is estimated at Band 8.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
Many feel it is crucial that home owners possess the freedom to design their own houses, while others believe that architectural design should be restricted. In my opinion, the value of preserving the character of local areas outweighs the right of property owners.
Proponents of creative freedom argue that such autonomy can inspirethe freedom can inspire and motivatemotivae homeowners. When an owner has the ability to express an individual vision, they are naturally more invested in improving their property. Numerous examples of this can be found in newer cities such as Shenzhen in mainland China. There is little architectural heritage to disrupt, so architects are encouraged to work with owners to pursue an aesthetically pleasingan aesthetic and cutting-edge design. TheThis result is modern buildings and offices that push the boundaries of design, and collectively contribute energy and vitality that can enliven or even revitalise local areas.
However, in the majority of communities, it is more important to prioritize cultural preservation. This is because the unique character of many cities and neighbourhoods is currently under threat from the irreversible effects of globalisation. A clear example is Tokyo in Japan. The government has imposed strict regulations in recent years as a growing middle class has attempted to modernize residential propertiesthe living quarters. To preserve the city's historic charactercharater, strict guidelines target designated historic districts and traditional neighbourhoods. Within these zones, new residents have to obey a locally adapted architectural style, using classic wooden shutters and older building materials, and the demolitiondomolition of typical historical homes is banned.
In conclusion, despite endeavors to allow for freedom of expression in designdesigns, I believe that it is generally more valuable to follow and preserve historically relevant design principles.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The essay presents a clear position throughout while effectively discussing both perspectives with concrete, well-developed examples. Logical organization and sophisticated language choices maintain strong readability across all paragraphs. To reach the highest level, focus on eliminating minor typographical errors and fine-tuning sentence structures for maximum precision.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both sides of the debate are fully explored with relevant supporting examples, and a clear personal opinion is maintained throughout.
Ensure all supporting points directly link back to the prompt's specific focus on residential houses.
Coherence and Cohesion
Information is organized logically with clear paragraph divisions and smooth transitions between contrasting ideas.
Vary cohesive markers slightly to avoid reliance on standard transition phrases at the beginning of paragraphs.
Lexical Resource
A wide range of natural, topic-specific vocabulary is used precisely to convey complex arguments.
Proofread carefully to eliminate occasional minor spelling slips and typos.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A broad variety of complex sentence structures is used accurately with consistently strong grammatical control.
Double-check sentence phrasing to prevent minor article and noun-phrase errors.