Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
Sample Response
Physicist Enrico Fermi discovered the potential of nuclear fission in 1934 and later Albert Einstein during the end of the 20th century enhanced the possibility of its usages with his sole aim to use for peaceful purposes. Almost all developed countries employ this innovation for numerous reasons like power generation to craft a bomb. Although I believe that there are safety issues, I agree that nuclear technology must be employed wherever it is beneficial. The basis for my views is economical and ecological.
From an economical point of view, even though the initial investment is quite high to ensure multilevel security, the running cost of the nuclear-powered industries are negligible, when compared to its peers. For instance, in a nuclear power reactor, one gramme of uranium can generate electricity equivalent to a thermal reactor which consumes one thousand kilogrammes of coal. Moreover, nuclear reactor supports conservation of natural resources as it requires lesser input. Therefore, nuclear-based plants need to be functional.
From an ecological perspective, the nuclear plant supports greener environment due to the fact that its remains are biodegradable. In addition to that, the nuclear process does not exhaust poisonous gases like its competitors. For example, as per the recent research by the American scientists, air pollution is highest and lowest in those nations which rely on petroleum based industries and nuclear plants respectively, to generate electricity. Petroleum based industries exhale toxic gases like carbon monoxide and methane which are hazardous. Thus, it is obvious that nuclear-based plants should be operational.
In conclusion, by analysing how nuclear-based industries save a myriad of money and resources as well as walk in hands with the environment, it is agreed that nuclear technology must be put into force wherever it seems advantageous. It is predicted that many rounds of safety checks are carried out before a nuclear plant is operational.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Use the correct adjective Original: economical Suggested revision: economic Why it matters: “Economic” relates to costs and finance, whereas “economical” means inexpensive.
- 2. Use economic Original: economical Suggested revision: economic Why it matters: The adjective describing a financial perspective is “economic.”
- 3. Clarify the cost reason Original: initial investment is quite high to ensure multilevel security Suggested revision: initial investment is high because safety is required at multiple levels Why it matters: The revision states the relationship between investment and safety more clearly.
- 4. Fix number agreement Original: the running cost of the nuclear-powered industries are Suggested revision: the running costs of nuclear-powered industries are Why it matters: The plural verb “are” requires the plural head noun “costs.”
- 5. Clarify the comparison Original: negligible, when compared to its peers Suggested revision: negligible compared with those of other energy industries Why it matters: The plural pronoun now refers clearly to costs, and the unnecessary comma is removed.
- 6. Remove redundancy Original: nuclear power reactor Suggested revision: nuclear reactor Why it matters: “Nuclear reactor” already identifies the type of power system, so “power” is redundant.
- 7. Compare equal quantities Original: electricity equivalent to a thermal reactor Suggested revision: as much electricity as a thermal reactor Why it matters: The “as much ... as” structure correctly compares the amount of electricity generated.
- 8. Use plural agreement Original: nuclear reactor supports conservation Suggested revision: nuclear reactors support conservation Why it matters: A general statement about reactors requires a plural subject and plural verb.
- 9. Use the comparative correctly Original: lesser Suggested revision: less Why it matters: “Less” is the standard comparative determiner before the uncountable noun “input.”
- 10. Use formal wording Original: need to be functional Suggested revision: should remain operational Why it matters: The revision expresses continued operation more precisely and formally.
- 11. Fix number and article Original: the nuclear plant supports greener environment Suggested revision: nuclear plants support a greener environment Why it matters: The general claim needs a plural subject and an article before the singular countable noun “environment.”
- 12. Use a concise link Original: due to the fact that Suggested revision: because Why it matters: The single conjunction expresses the causal relationship more directly.
Suggested Rewrites
- economical economic
- economical economic
- initial investment is quite high to ensure multilevel security initial investment is high because safety is required at multiple levels
- the running cost of the nuclear-powered industries are the running costs of nuclear-powered industries are
- negligible, when compared to its peers negligible compared with those of other energy industries
- nuclear power reactor nuclear reactor
Why this response received Band 6.5
The essay maintains a clear supportive position and organises its economic and ecological reasons in a straightforward, relevant structure. Its main limitation is frequent imprecise wording and several loosely supported claims, which reduce the authority of otherwise understandable reasoning; the brief mention of safety is also left undeveloped. Prioritise natural academic collocations and explain how concrete safeguards would address the acknowledged risks before concluding.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear position is supported by developed economic and ecological arguments, but the acknowledged safety concern is not meaningfully evaluated.
Explain one major safety risk and the safeguard needed to manage it, then show why the constructive benefits still justify the qualified support.
Coherence and Cohesion
The introduction, two reason-based body paragraphs, and conclusion form a logical progression, though some supporting claims are loosely connected within sentences.
Use each body paragraph to move explicitly from claim to explanation to relevant example, avoiding abrupt assertions at the end.
Lexical Resource
The response attempts a broad academic vocabulary, but frequent inaccurate collocations such as craft a bomb, exhaust gases, and myriad of money reduce precision.
Use standard expressions such as manufacture weapons, emit toxic gases, save substantial money, and work in harmony with the environment.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mix of sentence forms communicates the main ideas, but agreement, article, comparison, and clause-structure errors occur regularly.
Check subject-verb agreement and pronoun reference in every complex sentence, especially comparisons involving costs, reactors, and alternative energy sources.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.