Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? What is your viewpoint on this issue? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
5 Corrections
Band
- Band 6.5View annotated correction →
- Task Response
- Band 6.5
- Coherence and Cohesion
- Band 7.0
- Lexical Resource
- Band 6.5
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy
- Band 6.5
It is believed that old, historic buildings are not useful to the community and they occupy space in an already premium location. Take Colosseum of Rome for example, the building occupies a lot of space in the middle of a city but it has more advantages that compensate for the loss of premium due to land cost.
- Band 6.5View annotated correction →
- Task Response
- Band 6.5
- Coherence and Cohesion
- Band 6.5
- Lexical Resource
- Band 6.5
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy
- Band 6.0
Modernization has resulted in the rapid expansion of cities, which has left its heritage and culture behind. Day by day new commercial complexes and other buildings are coming up in the place of older buildings.
- Band 6.5View annotated correction →
- Task Response
- Band 7.0
- Coherence and Cohesion
- Band 6.0
- Lexical Resource
- Band 6.0
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy
- Band 6.0
Some may acquiesce with the fact that replacing old structures with contemporary monuments is a good idea while others may not condone with this. However, I candidly believe that historic structures should be preserved.