In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
Sample Response
It is true that science and technology, nowadays, have benefitted the whole world in all aspects. Although science and technology have a greater impact onin our lives, the role of artists remains significantthe role of artists is unforgettable, and they contribute greatly to our livescontribute a lot in our lives.
There are many things that artists can tell us about life that science and technology cannotscience and technology failed to. To commence with, communication between people in every nation which is the language that they speak with each other, in fact, is a branch of art, this gives people the sense of humanity, and this perhaps the only difference between human beings and animals. Furthermore, creative people can upliftboost us emotionally and influencechange our feelings. For example, many Beethoven fanslots of Beethoven's fans listen to his compositionsmusic pieces because they feel relieved and motivated, so music influencescontrols our emotions and expressestranslates our feelings.
Art can also teach us aboutAnother field in which we learn from art is related to culture and history. Many states show their history through a piece of painting or the way that people dance and wear, for the majority of people this is the sort of entertainment too, there are people who travel around the globe to visit historical places and art galleries. By contrast, this is not the case with science and technology, aswhen science and technology are considered as they are concerned withthey all about practical and physical aspectsaspect and do not contribute toin our lives emotionally and socially. To conclude, it is clear thatthere is no denying the fact that science and technology have great value in our liveslife. However, artists can teach people about many aspects of lifemany aspects of their life that science and technology cannotthat the former cannot.
Why this response received Band 6.0
The essay identifies relevant areas that art reveals—human connection, emotion, culture, and history—and the Beethoven example gives one idea useful support. Its main limitation is that several claims are broad or questionable and long comma-linked sentences reduce clarity. The highest-priority improvement is to develop two precise contrasts between artistic insight and scientific knowledge, using controlled sentences and specific examples for each.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response answers the question with several relevant distinctions, but some claims are only loosely explained or insufficiently convincing.
Focus on two defensible ideas, such as emotional expression and cultural memory, and explain why science cannot provide them in the same way.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction, thematic progression, and conclusion, but very long sentences weaken internal flow.
Separate each main idea and example into shorter sentences with explicit logical links.
Lexical Resource
There is sufficient range for discussing art, emotion, and culture, though several collocations and expressions are imprecise.
Use natural phrases such as affects our lives, evokes emotion, reflects culture, and practical dimensions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex structures are attempted frequently, but run-on sentences, missing verbs, agreement errors, and article problems reduce control.
Replace comma splices with full stops or conjunctions and check that every clause contains a complete verb phrase.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.