People think that countries should produce foods that their population eats and import less food as much as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
Some people believe that countries should produce their own food for their citizens and reduce the amount of food that is imported. Personally, I totally agree with this point of view.
There are several reasons why a country should produce its own food for its population, one of which is the creation of more jobs. When the demand for domestically produced food grows within a country, there will be more job opportunities available for local people in the farming and food-processing industriesfarming and food processing industries, leading to a reduction in unemployment rates. Secondly, it may be easier to control food quality when it is produced domestically, as authorities can easily monitor farms and food processing plants in orderplants, in order to maintain safe, hygienic standards for foodsafe, hygienic food standards.
Additionally, food imports should be reduced for several reasonsdue to a number of reasons. Firstly, imposing barriers on food importsputting barriers on importing food can help boosthelp to boost a country’s economy by eliminating the competition that local companies face fromwith foreign products, allowing them to be more profitable and contribute to the national economy. Furthermore, food importation can have negative environmental impacts due to the large quantitiesamounts of carbon emissions generated by transporting productsreleased from the transportation of products all around the world via planes, trucks, and ships. By reducing food imports, countries can help protectplay their part in helping to protect the environment, rather than contributing to environmental issues such as climate change.
In conclusion, I believe that each country should invest in the development of its agricultural industry to provide food for the population itself, and import as little as possible.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The essay answers the question directly, maintains a consistent position, and develops several relevant economic, regulatory, and environmental reasons in a well-controlled structure. The principal limitation is that a few claims, especially about restricting imports and eliminating competition, are stated rather broadly rather than qualified. To improve further, add a brief acknowledgement of practical trade-offs and refine a few slightly awkward collocations.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear position is fully maintained and supported with several relevant, well-explained reasons covering domestic production and reduced imports.
Qualify the broad claim about import barriers by acknowledging a practical limitation or condition while preserving the clear stance.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas are sequenced logically in focused paragraphs, and cohesive devices guide the reader clearly throughout.
Vary the opening transitions in the body paragraphs so the organisation feels slightly less enumerative.
Lexical Resource
The response uses a wide and precise range of topic vocabulary, with only occasional slightly awkward collocations.
Refine phrases about competition with foreign products and emissions from transportation to make them more idiomatic and exact.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A wide range of complex sentence forms is used accurately, with most sentences error-free and punctuation well controlled.
Polish minor comma placement and phrasing in longer sentences to make already accurate structures more concise.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
People think that countries should produce foods that their population eats and import less food as much as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.