Some people say that there is no need to give international aid by governments as they already have unemployment and homeless in their own country. How far do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?

It is a big concern for many people that it is not 1a responsibilitya compulsory responsibility of their government to provide international aid to other countries owing to the fact that they have some obstacles in their home country. In my opinion, I would like to 2take a middle-ground positionstay in middle ground of this debate.

Firstly, one important 3responsibilityaspect of a government is to invest money in their own country instead of 4providing aidgiving wealth to other countries. In fact, it is true that when the unemployment rate is high in a country and people 5inof this country 6need a better economic structureneed better economic structure, they would not 7support their governments supplyingsupport that their governments supply aid and money to other poor countries. Naturally, they would expect their own problems to be sorted out first. For instance, if any government 8invests money in the constructioninvests money for the constructions of many new organisations like factories and health departments in their homeland, there will be 9greater opportunities for national developmentmore chances of development of country and 10better opportunities to reduce unemploymenthigh opportunities to control on unemployment.

Another important thing for any country’s government is to provide homes and some other facilities to homeless people rather than 11providing aid to other countrieslending money to other countries because in this way the economy would be better than before in that country. If any government has 12extra money, it should firstextra money firstly they should focus on 13essentialcompulsory needs of their own country 14after that, the remaining money can be providedafter that it can be provided 15as international aid to other countriesas the international aid to other countries.

However, we live in a 16shared worldsingle globe and when people in some parts of the world are starving, many others have 17abundantopulent resources. Sharing among nations can ensure a better world. The economic structure of the present world would never allow a country to ensure 100% employment and houses for people to live in. 18Therethere will always be homeless people and jobless youth even in developed countries. So considering these, a rich nation should always help the poor nations in need. Don’t we help people with our resources and money when we still have a scarcity of these? Similarly, a comparatively rich country should always 19lend a helping handraise the helping hand to the poor nations. The sharing of wealth will eliminate more pressing problems in poor nations and thus in return they would also help in other ways. For example, rich countries like the USA invest in research facilities in many Asian countries and in return they can have meritorious scientists living and working for them and better business understanding.

In conclusion, the government of a country should first 20meet the needs of its own citizensfulfil the necessity of its own citizens. To a certain extent, they should 21share their surplus wealth with poor countriesshare their extra wealth to poor countries as the international aid that can be helpful for 22both countriesboth of the countries.