It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a Metro city. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
NowadaysIn present times, education is one of the essentialcrucial needs of individuals to survive in the competitive job marketthe competitive market. While some people believe that children should grow up in rural areas instead of growing up in megacities, I completely disagreehere I completely disagree with this viewthis given logic and will discuss it further in this essaymonogram.
The main reasonfirst and foremost reason is that children should live and develop in a citythe city area, as many activities are available in the city centre to support children’s mental and physical developmentbuild mental and physical health for children. For instance, a child living in a city has many options for development like high-tech education schools, easy availability of resources like books and other materials that can make them more engaged and they can be more updated with the current times. Moreover, students can easily workcoordinate with a mentor who helps them improve their skills, whereasand on the contrary, such facilities are not easily available in villages.
Another reason to live in a big city is that children can competethe child can compete with others, and this can help themit will help them learn new skills like time management, communication, and other abilitiesand others, while; While in rural areas, living conditions are less developedthe lives of individuals are not much upgraded than in megacitiesas compared to megacities. Also, individuals have fewer opportunitiesdo not find more opportunities to develop in rural areas. For example, in recent times, numerous students go abroadhave been going abroad to study and pursuedevelop their careers.
To recapitulate, in my viewas far as my point of view is concerned, I believe that children should stay in the city to develop and lead a good life compared to the lives of individuals in rural areas.
Why this response received Band 6.0
The response gives a clear opinion and organises two main reasons into an easy-to-follow structure. However, development is uneven: the second argument remains general, and its example about studying abroad does not clearly demonstrate the benefits of growing up in a city. Focus on building each reason with a directly relevant explanation and example, while improving collocation and sentence control.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The prompt is addressed with a consistent position, but some supporting ideas are general or only partly relevant.
Explain precisely how each claimed city advantage affects childhood development and choose examples that directly prove that link.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing and overall progression are clear, though some linking is mechanical and several long sentences contain loosely connected ideas.
Give each body paragraph one sharply defined central claim and link its explanation and example directly to that claim.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is adequate for the topic and shows some range, but awkward choices such as monogram and upgraded weaken accuracy.
Prefer precise, natural academic collocations and avoid replacing familiar words with unsuitable formal-sounding alternatives.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses both simple and complex forms, but punctuation, clause control, and awkward sentence construction cause recurring errors.
Break overloaded sentences into controlled units and check capitalization, comparison structures, and subordinate-clause punctuation.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a Metro city. Do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.