Some people think the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
Some people believe that more national funding should be allocated to the teaching of science subjects rather than other subjects because these disciplines could facilitate the growth of a country. This essay strongly disagrees with this opinion, asserting that a strong and flourishing country results from a combination of humanities and science subjectsa combination of both humanities and science subjects.
There are valid reasons why some advocate for prioritizing science education. In the current technological landscape, science has paved the way for numerous breakthroughs that drive a country's development. For instance, the United StatesAmerica is renowned as a technological powerhouse, home to numerous tech giants such as Apple and Google. Such achievements are largely the result of massive investments in science and technology within the American education systemwithin their educational system. Similarly, countries such as China and Germany have experiencedalso experienced remarkable growth due to similar investments in these fields. Therefore, it is undeniable that science significantly contributes to national development.
However, for a country to experience holistic development and long-term prosperity, investment should also be directed towards the humanitieshumanities should also be invested in, with history being a prime example. When citizens are knowledgeable about their homeland’s origins and the endeavors of previous generations to unify the country, they develop a sense of patriotism. This patriotism is a foundation for the desire and effortthe foundation of the desire and effort to build and develop a country. Conversely, when people are ignorant about their country's history and feel little gratitude towards previous generationshave little gratitude towards the past, it is challenging for them to contribute to their homelanddevote themselves to their homeland, potentially leading to issues like brain drain. Moreover, teaching international historical events is equally crucial. Insights into world wars or conflicts occurring in other parts of the world help people, especially youngeryoung generations, understand the value of peace, which is another essential foundationgroundwork for a developed and united country. Such knowledge can bolster people’s faith in their home country and encourage them to dedicate themselves to its development and protection. Humanities subjects like literature and philosophy also play a vital role in fostering critical thinking, empathy, and ethical reasoning, all of which are essential for well-rounded citizens.
In conclusion, while it is true that science and technology are vital for a country's progress, this essay argues that educational funding should not be disproportionately channeled into these fields at the expense of the humanities. A balanced approach that values both scientific and humanitiessocial subjects is crucial for fostering patriotism, critical thinking, and a comprehensive understanding of the world, which collectively form the foundation of a country's growth.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response presents a clear, consistent position and develops a persuasive case for balanced funding, with particularly strong explanation of how humanities contribute to national development. Its main limitation is that some supporting claims about national investment and patriotism are broad or asserted too confidently. Prioritise more carefully qualified evidence and tighter links between each example and the precise funding comparison in the prompt.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The position is clear throughout, and the case for balanced funding is fully developed with relevant reasons and examples.
Qualify broad causal claims about national investment and connect each example more explicitly to the proposed funding priority.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress logically through a clear introduction, contrasting body sections, and a conclusion that consistently reinforces the position.
Balance the body paragraphs more evenly and trim repetition within the extended discussion of humanities.
Lexical Resource
A wide and precise vocabulary supports nuanced discussion of education, development, history, and civic values.
Refine a few awkward collocations, such as describing humanities as subjects that should receive investment, to make the language more natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A broad range of complex structures is used accurately, with only occasional minor awkwardness that does not impede meaning.
Streamline some heavily layered sentences so that relationships between causes, examples, and outcomes remain immediately clear.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.