Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to protect wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that protecting wild animals and birds receives disproportionate attention and resources compared to pressing human needs. While I understand that investing in wildlife conservation is necessary and beneficial, it is also important to ensure that 1this conservation workthis effort does not overshadow other urgent human needs.

Protecting wild animals and birds is a 2necessary investment that benefits both nature and humanitynecessary investment for both nature and humanity. One reason is that preserving biodiversity is essential for maintaining ecological balance and environmental health. Each species, no matter how small, contributes to the stability of ecosystems 3through its specific roleby playing a specific role in natural processes. As a result, protecting wildlife helps to sustain clean air, fresh water, fertile soil, and interconnected 4food chains on which humans also relyfood chains that humans also rely on. 5A further consideration is thatAnother important point is that conservation 6is both a moral responsibility and a source of long-term benefitsreflects both a moral responsibility and a long-term benefit to future generations. By actively preserving endangered species, we ensure that the natural world remains 7protectedintact and accessible for those who come after us. Therefore, environmental care is not just a matter of ethics, but also a step toward a more sustainable future.

However, 8other urgent needs also warrant attention and fundingother urgent needs deserve more focus and funding. 9A major concernThe first notable concern is that social 10prioritiessectors such as education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation are often underfunded. These areas directly affect human well-being and development, yet they may receive less attention when resources are heavily directed toward wildlife protection. Excessive focus on animal conservation 11can therefore limittherefore can limit the support available for essential public services. Another issue is the potential inefficiency of some conservation projects. In certain cases, large sums of money are spent on protecting rare species that have minimal ecological impact. When this occurs, the 12spending may be viewed as symbolic rather than effectivefunds may be viewed as symbolic rather than practical, producing little real-world benefit and leading to a misuse of limited resources.

In conclusion, although I believe that protecting wild animals and birds is a valuable and morally sound goal, it is also important to strike a balance by allocating resources judiciously across social and environmental priorities. By doing so, we can ensure that conservation efforts complement—rather than compete with—human development goals.