Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Sample Response
People have different views about the government funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government sponsorship for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.
Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their offering financial assistance, our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.
On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government spending for art. The main reason for this view is that more important problems are now at the top of the government’s agenda. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.
IELTS Writing Correction
- 1. Correct the preposition Original: the government funding of creative artists Suggested revision: government funding for creative artists Why it matters: “Funding for” is the more natural collocation when naming the recipients.
- 2. Use formal funding language Original: money for art projects should come from Suggested revision: art projects should be funded by Why it matters: The revision expresses the funding relationship more directly and formally.
- 3. Use a concise place name Original: the docks area of the city Suggested revision: the city's docklands Why it matters: “The city's docklands” is a more concise and natural expression.
- 4. Avoid semantic overlap Original: culture, heritage and history Suggested revision: the city's culture and heritage Why it matters: “Heritage” and “history” overlap here, so the shorter phrase is more precise.
- 5. Remove the unnecessary comma Original: about the city, and act Suggested revision: about the city and act Why it matters: The two coordinated verb phrases share the same subject and do not need a comma.
- 6. Remove redundant wording Original: visitors and tourists Suggested revision: visitors Why it matters: “Tourists” are already included within the broader term “visitors.”
- 7. Use a precise funding verb Original: pay Suggested revision: fund Why it matters: “Fund” connects the proposal more directly to the essay's central issue.
- 8. Simplify the possessive gerund Original: without their offering financial assistance Suggested revision: without such financial assistance Why it matters: The revision removes an awkward possessive-gerund construction while preserving the meaning.
- 9. Correct the collocation Original: for Suggested revision: on Why it matters: The standard collocation is “spending on” a particular area.
- 10. Choose an accurate noun Original: budgets Suggested revision: funds Why it matters: Funds or money are spent, whereas budgets are allocated.
- 11. Improve the comparison Original: do a job like any other professional Suggested revision: work like other professionals Why it matters: The revision creates a direct and natural comparison between artists and other professionals.
Suggested Rewrites
- the government funding of creative artists government funding for creative artists
- money for art projects should come from art projects should be funded by
- the docks area of the city the city's docklands
- culture, heritage and history the city's culture and heritage
- about the city, and act about the city and act
- visitors and tourists visitors
Why this response received Band 8.0
The response is strongest in its balanced, well-developed treatment of both funding positions, supported by a specific public-art example and a consistently clear opinion. The main limitation is that the alternative-funding side is somewhat less fully explored, relying mainly on artists selling their work. To strengthen an already accomplished argument, develop one additional credible alternative source and connect it explicitly to the final mixed-funding position.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both views are addressed directly and developed with relevant reasoning, while the writer's qualified opinion remains clear throughout.
Develop the alternative-sources case with one more concrete funding route, such as private patronage or commercial sponsorship.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is logically sequenced, paragraphs have clear central purposes, and cohesion is handled naturally across the argument.
Make the relationship between the two body arguments and the final mixed-funding position even more explicit in the conclusion.
Lexical Resource
A wide and precise vocabulary is used naturally, including effective topic-specific language about public services, heritage, sponsorship, and state budgets.
Continue refining less direct expressions so every phrase is as economical and natural as the strongest parts of the essay.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response uses a wide range of complex structures with consistently accurate grammar and punctuation.
Maintain this control while varying sentence openings slightly more to add further stylistic flexibility.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.