Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
It is thought that information aboutthe information regarding politicians’ personal lives should not be shared in print media. This essay strongly agrees with this suggestion because publishing these details could be harmful to their families, and obtaining this type of information might require breaking the law.
First and foremost, the reasonwhat makes that details ofthe details related to politicians’ private livesprivate aspects of politicians’ lives should not be shared in newspapers is that revealing them could be harmfulit could be harmful not only to these individuals but also to their families. This is because revealing details of their personal livessome details from their personal lives could expose them to unwanted comments or allegations, which might lead to a great deal of distress. In Poland, for instance, in 2015, the deputy prime ministervice-prime minister committed suicide because he could not cope with the pressuredue to not handling the pressure caused by the paparazzi invading his and his family’s privacyinvading his and his family’s private life.
Furthermore, obtaining this type of information in most cases meansinformation, in most cases, means breaking the law. This is because the right to privacy is one of the most fundamental rightspolicies in society, and anyone who wants to access information about politicians’ livesaccess the lives of politicians must obtain their consent. However, not only are paparazzi hired to invade properties belonging to politicians to take photos without their permission, but also politicians’ colleagues and relatives are bribed to share confidential facts from their lives. For instance, the accident that killed Princess Dianaan accident in which Princess Diana was killed was partly caused by the paparazzi who followed her car, trying to take photos of her and her boyfriend against their will.
In conclusion, I strongly support the suggestion that politicians’ lives should not be a subject of interest to newspaperssubject to the interest of newspapers because revealing personal facts from politicians’ livespoliticians lives could damage their family livesdestroy their family life and the process of obtaining these details often required wrongdoing.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response presents a clear, consistent position and supports both main reasons with relevant explanation and concrete examples. Its main limitation is occasional imprecision and awkwardness in phrasing, which weakens an otherwise convincing argument. The highest-priority improvement is to refine collocations and sentence construction so that complex ideas are expressed more naturally and precisely throughout.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The position is clear throughout, and both reasons are relevant and developed with explanation and examples.
Develop the causal link in each example more critically rather than relying on a dramatic event as sufficient proof.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay progresses logically through a clear introduction, two focused body paragraphs, and a consistent conclusion.
Use more natural internal transitions and reduce repetitive references to personal details and private lives.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is varied and generally appropriate, although several collocations are awkward or imprecise.
Replace expressions such as fundamental policies and subject to the interest of newspapers with precise, idiomatic alternatives.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A good range of complex structures is used with generally secure control and only occasional non-impeding errors.
Proofread possessives, tense consistency, and awkward clause openings to improve grammatical precision.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.