Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
Ancient buildings are relics of the past and should be preserved, in the view of some people. Others, however, believe that the constructionappearance of modern buildings will create new opportunities for national developmentopen a new horizon for the development of a nation. My essay will discuss the arguments on both sidesvalidity of both sides.
The ancient houses are, first, believed to be the reservoirbelieved to the reservoir of the glorious past of a nation. With their existence along each road, it is undeniable that no sooner does young generation grow up than they become proud of their country’s admirable old-day history through the image of roof, ceiling and walls. Philosophically speaking, like a person who clings to the past to reflect, views the present to enjoy and contemplates the future, a city itself entails an inextricable link of these three-time axes to revise, thrive and fly. Nevertheless, in the case of derelict old housesin case of derelict old houses, thesuch experience of living in these shelters could be a nightmare for many peoplea nightmare to quite a few people, for instance, residents of HanoiHanoi people who are enduring a poor quality of lifesuffering a low-quality life in an ancient street. It is a common situation for some residentsa common-scene to some that three to four households have only one toilet system with their layers of paint on their wallswall painting layers bound to peel off and their ceilings sagging owing to weathering.
Another rationale is that these old houses are symbolic of the unique architecture and serve as a source of mental reliefmental panacea for hurry-sickness city-dwellers. Hardly can the modern-day people recreate such beauties as that by famous architects of yesterdays who utilized the past materials, and for that reason, some streets adorned with second-to-none buildings are ideal destinations for the visitors world-wide to savour themselves in the sense of serene old days. To those who are caught up in a hectic lifesucking in a life of craze, the tiny old houses resemble oases to ease their stress. Opponents argue thatOpponents have their points in the belief that as a result of the rapid population growthexplosion of population, so crowded do streets turn out that these old, unsafe and dirty houses should be demolished to give way to skyscrapers to accommodate an ever-increasing number of people who flock to the city in the hope of a better life. Also, not until the cities are paved with modern buildings and wide roads do investors from other continents pay greater attention, which, in turn, generates a huge amount of profit for the entire nation.
In the final analysis, each idea has its own reasoning, but in my opinion, the presence of old houses is essential to the survival of any city because they are original and provide unforgettable destinations for travellersfor their originality and unforgettable destinations of travel lovers.
Why this response received Band 6.0
The response is strongest in the breadth of its ideas, considering heritage, architecture, tourism, housing pressure, and investment from both perspectives. Its main limitation is that an initially delayed position and heavily embellished language sometimes obscure the argument. The highest-priority improvement is to state the stance clearly at the outset and express each supporting point in direct, accurately controlled sentences before adding stylistic complexity.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The essay addresses the issue extensively and reaches a clear conclusion, but its own position is not established consistently from the introduction.
State a direct position in the introduction and make each body paragraph explicitly support the final judgement.
Coherence and Cohesion
The response has a recognisable progression, but long body paragraphs combine competing ideas and some elaborate linking disrupts clarity.
Give each paragraph one controlling idea and use straightforward transitions to separate support for preservation from arguments for redevelopment.
Lexical Resource
The writer attempts a wide and ambitious vocabulary, but frequent unnatural collocations and word choices reduce precision.
Prioritise natural combinations such as heritage value and urban residents, and avoid invented or overly literary expressions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A substantial range of complex structures is attempted, yet recurring errors in articles, complements, modifiers, and inversions weaken control.
Use shorter clause patterns accurately and reserve inversion for contexts where its form and emphasis are fully controlled.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. Do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.