In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
Sample Response
Undeniably, educational institutions and specialised hospitals are located in urban areasin the urban areas in almost all countries around the globe. To distribute these facilities equally among citizensequalise these facilities among the citizens of a country, most peoplemost of the people believe that the governmenthave the opinion that government should make regulations for compulsory rural service after professionals graduateafter the graduation by the professionals. Whereas others believe that it is an unethical interference with someone’s freedom. This essay examines both viewsdelves both these views before arriving at a logical conclusion.
On the one handOn one hand, mandatory service after graduation by health professionals and educational faculty is highly beneficialare astonishingly beneficial to the rural people. For instance, one to three years of compulsory rural serviceFor instance compulsory, one-three years rural service for new teachers, doctors, dentists etc. will alleviate the scarcity of trained professionals in rural areasthe village area. In addition, those who have qualified from the government institutions receiving a grant from the government have their responsibility to serve the government and the people. Moreover, because of the brain drainbecause of brain drain system communities receive far less servicecommunity is getting very less service from the talented professionals and compulsory work in rural areas by new doctors and teachers will ensure that they concentrate more on serving people rather than planning to migrate to a rich country. Rural people have to move to city areas for better treatment and for their children’s education and this has negative consequences such asa negative consequence like overpopulation, increased crime rate and pollution in citiespollution in city areas. Adopting this strategy by the government will ensure a better distribution of the population between rural and urban areasin both rural and city areas. Finally professionals like doctors and teachers should focus primarily on serving people, rather than amassing fortunesnot to amass fortunes. Unfortunately, teachers and doctors in many cases are far more concerned about money than helping people and few years’ compulsory work in rural areas at the beginningbegging of someone’s career would be a great leap toward a positive service-oriented mindsetappositive mind-setup by these professionals. On the other hand, some others believe that in an independent country everybody should have the freedom to decide where to work and where to live. Any restriction and mandatory rules would violate their rights and would cause them to become frustrated. These professionals would then dislike to work or stay in their homeland and will try to migrate to a foreign country. Furthermore, this should be a spontaneous decision made by a newly became doctor and teacher and should not be a forced decision. Hence the supporters of this view argue that compulsory work in rural areas is both unfair and harmful. Put everything into consideration, I personally feel that for a rapid and complete development of a nation both rural and city areas should get focus for facilities and development. The government should ensure the equal distribution of services and place new doctors and teachers in rural areas for few years would be a great idea to help rural people and also build a service oriented mentality among these young professionals.
Why this response received Band 6.0
The response addresses both compulsory rural service and freedom of employment, develops several effects on rural communities and professionals, and clearly supports temporary placements. Its main limitations are severe paragraph imbalance and frequent imprecise language: nearly the entire discussion and conclusion appear in one long block, while some claims about professionals are unfairly broad. The priority is to organise each view separately and justify compulsory service through evidence-based policy arguments.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
Both views and a clear opinion are substantially developed, although several supporting claims are overgeneralised or moralising.
Focus on defensible arguments such as staffing shortages, public funding obligations, incentives, and the risk of professional resentment.
Coherence and Cohesion
The overall contrast between the views is recognisable, but combining both sides and the conclusion in one exceptionally long paragraph seriously weakens progression.
Use one focused paragraph for compulsory service, one for freedom of choice, and a separate conclusion that weighs them.
Lexical Resource
The response attempts a broad policy vocabulary, but frequent inaccurate collocations, word forms, and spelling choices reduce clarity.
Use precise expressions such as rural placement, publicly funded training, shortage of professionals, voluntary service, and service-oriented outlook.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Meaning remains mostly clear despite frequent errors in articles, agreement, prepositions, verb forms, fragments, and sentence boundaries.
Build shorter complete sentences and check article and verb patterns, especially around graduates, professionals, and government policy.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.