It is important that we maintain and protect the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it is expensive for countries to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sample Response
It is often pointed out that historical buildings are valuable parts of a country's heritagevaluable treasures for a country and should be preserved even if the government needs to spend large sumshefty amounts on them. I completely agree with this viewpoint, Deleteand my position is outlined in this essay. First of all, historicold and traditional buildings are of great architectural importance. Their sublime design attracts tourists and locals alike and is quite rare in modern structures. These historical edifices also allow us to learngive us an opportunity to learn about the historyglorious past. For example, the Roman Colosseum in Rome not only shows how awe-inspiring ancient architectural designthe ancient architectural designs were but also shows its function as a massive arenapoints out a massive arena used as a stadium for gladiatorial contestsgladiators' fighting and can accommodatehas space to house around 50,000 spectators in tiered seating. This structure is a prominent examplea predominant representative of Roman culture and civilisation that modern historians value highlycherish profoundly. In addition to this, historical monuments also serve as tourist attractionsmagnetism in many countries. In today's world, many people plan their vacations in places of historical importance as they are curious to know more about the culture and traditions of the past. Many nations benefit fromMany nations are benefited from these tourists, and as a result, they have a thriving tourism industrypossess a booming tourism industry. For instance, millions of tourists, including many from abroadtourists including international tourists visit the Taj Mahal in India every year. This provides the government with substantial revenuea huge profit and also employs many locals, thus assisting the government financially. To conclude, I believe, it is worth spending money on ancient buildings as they not only possess historical importance but also a financial kernel for many governments.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The essay presents a clear, consistent position and develops two relevant benefits of preservation with specific, persuasive examples. Its main weakness is imprecise word choice, while the absence of clear paragraph breaks makes an otherwise logical argument less easy to navigate. Use conventional collocations and separate the introduction, each main reason, and conclusion into distinct paragraphs while retaining the focused development.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response directly supports its complete agreement through well-developed architectural, historical, and economic reasons illustrated with specific examples.
Refine the argument by briefly linking the benefits more explicitly to why the high preservation cost remains justified.
Coherence and Cohesion
The argument follows a clear introduction-to-reasons-to-conclusion sequence and uses cohesive devices effectively, but it is presented as one continuous paragraph.
Separate the introduction, the two main arguments, and the conclusion into distinct paragraphs to make progression immediately visible.
Lexical Resource
A wide vocabulary conveys nuanced ideas, though several conspicuous collocations, including tourist magnetism and financial kernel, are unnatural or imprecise.
Replace ambitious but unsuitable combinations with conventional academic phrases such as tourist attraction and source of revenue.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The essay uses varied complex structures with generally strong control, despite occasional faulty coordination, passive forms, and punctuation.
Check long coordinated sentences for parallel structure and revise forms such as are benefited to benefit from.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
It is important that we maintain and protect the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it is expensive for countries to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.