World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Task Response

Band 5.0

Coherence and Cohesion

Band 5.0

Lexical Resource

Band 5.0

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

Band 5.0

Over the time, history has proved that male leadership shows some violence and conflict, while female leadership spreads peace. I agree that male performs more toughness than female in many aspects, especially in leadership, although, there are always some odds that break the rules.