If we look back at history it is seen that violence and conflict were evident under male leadership than female leadership. Does this suggest that female leadership is a better option? Would it ensure the peace and better growth in the society? What is your opinion on that?
Sample Response
The history of world civilisation holds innumerable stories and sagas of brutal and terrifying battles. In the continuum of kingdoms, the number of male rulers outnumbers a female rulerfemale rulers. And this fact raised debate among peoplearoused debatable though among people whether all the historical wars or disputes were a result of male dictatorship. Protagonists believe that female leadership is a solution to discourage such violentlethal trend to occur in future, whereas dissenters refute this idea. I am in complete disagreementconsummate discord with the proposal that putting women in leadership positionsbringing female leadership in place is a solution to control those disasters.
In order to reinforce my view, a number of arguments could be presented. Firstly, a situation such as a war, dispute, and riot cannot be easily attributed to thea gender of a leader. There are various agendas hidden behind such actions. For example, a country would engage in a war to retaliate against its adversaryretaliate its adversary. A riot could have been causedA tumult or riot could have engendered due to dissatisfaction or frustration of common public in response to a government policyin the response to a governmental policy. History has witnessedThe history has witnessed several male leaders who brought peace and freedom in the world, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and Nelson Mandela to name a few. History also has some examples where war was carried out under the leadership of female ruler. For example, the then Prime Minister of Great Britain, Margaret Thatcher had to take an extremely difficult decision to declare warannounce for a war to respondreciprocate to an imminent danger. So, it can be seen that a leader, irrespective of theirits gender, has to undergo severeserver decision-making process due to unavoidable circumstances.
However, talking about female leadership, a country could benefit from it to a great extentbenefit from it to great extent. The reason behind it is that females bring a different perspective of thought and can analyse the matter from a different angle. They usually tend to be inclined towards improving the living conditions of citizens and empowering the women legion. A survey conducted by Harvard Business University reveals that female leaders possess higher Emotional Quotient (EQ) than their male counterparts. This could be one reason why a female leader could make a differencefemale leader could make a difference in a society.
To sum up, after contemplating all the viewpoints of the topic at hand, I would reiterate that although female leadership has its own merits,although female leadership has its own merits, but that cannot be the solution to eradicate conflict or warfarewarship from society or the world. From a practical perspectiveOn pragmatic cognizance, one can discern that in order to reinforce peace and wisdom, a true leader will have to stand with theirits people in solidarity and instil harmony in other parts of the world.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response maintains a clear, balanced position that leadership quality and context matter more than gender, while also acknowledging possible benefits of female leadership. Its main limitation is that several claims and examples remain broad, and dense, over-formal phrasing sometimes weakens precision; prioritise tighter explanation of how institutions and leadership qualities shape peace and growth, using shorter sentences and more natural academic vocabulary.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The essay gives a clear opinion that female leadership alone will not ensure peace, and it considers both gender-neutral causes of conflict and possible benefits of female leadership. Some claims are broad and examples need tighter explanation.
Keep the balanced position but develop how leadership qualities, institutions, and context matter more than gender alone.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing and progression are generally clear, with an introduction, main argument, concession, and conclusion. Some long sentences and heavy phrasing slow the flow.
Use clearer topic sentences and shorten dense sentences so the argument remains easy to follow.
Lexical Resource
The essay shows a wide range of vocabulary, but it is sometimes over-formal or inaccurate, such as consummate discord, warship, and pragmatic cognizance.
Choose precise academic words over decorative phrasing, especially in the introduction and conclusion.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A variety of complex structures is attempted, but there are errors in articles, pronoun reference, agreement, and word form. These errors rarely block meaning but reduce polish.
Check articles and pronouns after abstract nouns such as leader, leadership, and society.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
If we look back at history it is seen that violence and conflict were evident under male leadership than female leadership. Does this suggest that female leadership is a better option? Would it ensure the peace and better growth in the society? What is your opinion on that?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.