Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Sample Response
A group of people believe that governments should provide subsidies for unpopular or amateur artists, while other people think that creative artistsartistic people should be subsidised from other sourcesanother resource. The following essay will discuss both viewsopinions, but in my personal opinion, I believe that governments should fund them before they are sponsored by alternative sources.
Several people believe that creative artistsartist such as street painters and musicians should not be subsidised by the governments. They think that artisticart activities are not athe basic need of human beings, and governments should focus on more important matters. For example, rather than spending part of the budgetspending some budget for these street artists, the fund could be allocated for improving the public education sectorsectors, public transporttransportations or public facilities. They think that creative artistsartist should seek sponsorship from private institutions or private companies.
On the other handFor several reasons, some people believe that creative artist should be funded by governments. Firstly, many amateur painters have painted public areashave painted some of the public areas, and they have changed the look and the atmosphere of these places from a unattractive atmospherenegative aura into a positive one. Secondly, some talented artists have made artistic sculptures and placed them in public areas such as in the parks, and they have made the parksmade the parks become more beautiful and attractive. Thirdly, many amateur musicians who performmusicians who are performing in public areas, such as in subways or in bus terminals have entertained the public with their music. Therefore, these examples suggestTherefore, it is undeniable that the existence of these artists brings benefits for societybenefits for the society and governments should subsidise them.
In conclusion, people have different opinions about funding creative artists. Some people think that they should be funded by governments, while others believe that they should be subsidised by other sourcesresources. FromIn my point of view, I think governments should allocate part of the budgetallocate some budget for amateur artists as they bring benefits for individuals and communities, but once these artists become professionalbut once they have become professional, they should seek sponsorship from other resources, and the government should stop providing the subsidy.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response is strongest in its clear discussion of both funding views and its practical position that public support should help amateur artists until other sponsorship is available. Its main limitation is that some supporting examples and public-benefit reasoning remain general, while repeated noun-form and article errors reduce precision. Prioritise explaining exactly when government funding is justified and when private support should take over, then proofread recurring phrases.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response discusses both views and gives a clear opinion that governments should support amateur artists until they can find alternative funding. The ideas are relevant and developed, though some examples could be more precise.
Add a stronger explanation of why public benefit justifies government funding, and show when private funding becomes more appropriate.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is logically organised into opposing view, supporting view, and conclusion. Cohesive devices are clear, but some paragraph openings are repetitive.
Vary paragraph openings and use clearer contrast language between public priorities and cultural benefits.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary is appropriate for the topic, with subsidies, sponsorship, public facilities, sculptures, and communities. Some repeated or inaccurate phrases reduce lexical control.
Use plural forms and precise nouns, such as "creative artists", "alternative sources", and "public funding".
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The essay contains a mix of sentence types and generally communicates well. Errors with singular/plural nouns, articles, and prepositions appear regularly.
Proofread repeated noun phrases such as "creative artists" and check article use before singular countable nouns.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.