Wild animals have no use in the 21 st century and trying to preserve animals now is just a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Sample Response
Some individuals think that preserving wild animals is futile in modern times since they serve no purpose, and it is a squandering of resources to do so. However, I strongly disagree with this opinion and believe that preserving wild animals is crucial for maintaining ecological balancemaintaining the balance of our ecosystem and promoting ecological sustainability.
Firstly, wild animals play a crucial role in the food chain and ecological balance. For instance, predators such as lions, tigers, and wolves are essential for controlling herbivore populationscontrolling the population of herbivores, thereby helping to regulatewhich in turn help to regulate the growth of plants and prevent overgrazing. Furthermore, wild animals such as bees and birds play an important role in pollinating plants and trees, which is essential for agriculture and the production of food.
Secondly, preserving wild animals and their habitats is essential for promoting biodiversity. The loss of biodiversity can lead to the extinction of species and can have negative impacts on ecosystems and human societies. For example, the loss of bees and other pollinators could result in a significant decrease in food production and a decline in the agricultural industry.
Finally, wild animals are also valuable to the tourism industryvaluable assets for the tourism industry, contributing significantly to the economy of many countries. Many people travel to different parts of the world to see and experience wildlife, and this generates income for local communities and governmentsfor the local communities and governments.
In conclusion, preserving wild animals is crucial for maintaining ecological balance, promoting biodiversity, and supporting the economy. It is our responsibility to protect and conserve the natural environment and the wildlife that inhabitsinhabit it for future generationsfuture generations to come.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The essay takes an unequivocal position and supports it with three relevant, logically developed reasons concerning ecological balance, biodiversity and tourism. Its strongest feature is the clear cause-and-effect explanation, particularly around predator control and pollination; the main limitation is some repetition between the first two ecological arguments. The priority is to distinguish those points more sharply and add slightly more specific support to the economic argument.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
A clear disagreement is maintained and supported through well-developed ecological, biodiversity and economic arguments with relevant examples.
Differentiate biodiversity more clearly from ecological balance and develop the tourism point with one specific illustrative outcome.
Coherence and Cohesion
The essay progresses smoothly through three distinct reasons, with purposeful paragraphs and clear internal sequencing.
Reduce the slight conceptual overlap between the first two body paragraphs by giving each a more sharply defined focus.
Lexical Resource
A wide and precise range of environmental and economic vocabulary is used naturally, with only rare awkward phrasing.
Refine expressions such as "a squandering of resources" to the more natural "a wasteful use of resources".
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Complex sentences are varied and well controlled, with the great majority of structures error-free and meaning consistently precise.
Maintain this control while trimming minor redundancies such as "future generations to come".
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Wild animals have no use in the 21 st century and trying to preserve animals now is just a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.