The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962, 1982 and 2002.

Same questionCompare 2 different answers (Band 6.5–8)

Sample Response

1

The bar chart details the proportion of people immigrating to Australia from five countries in 1962, 1982 and 2002. Overall, whilst proportions of immigrantsimmigrant rates from New Zealand and Italy decreased, those of the UK, Vietnam, and India rose in the first half of the period, but later experienced drops in the second half, with Vietnam undergoing the most significant fluctuation.

2

In 1962, 40% of the immigrants to Australia were Italian, ranking first among the five nations surveyed. The rates of the remaining countries were much lower, with 10% each for the UK and Vietnam, around 8% for New Zealand, and about 2%below 3% for India.

3

The rankings, however, changed significantly over the next 20 years when the Vietnamese became the dominant group of immigrants, experiencing a two-and-a-half-fold risenearly threefold leap to 25%, whilst the proportion from ItalyItalian rates halved to 20%. In the meantime, the figures for the UK and India rose towere higher, adding up to 17% and 15% respectively. New Zealand’s rate was the only one to show a downward trend, falling moderately to 5%.

4

In 2002, it can be seen that the proportionsimmigrant demographics were more evenly dispersed. The rates of four of the five countriesfour over five countries (the UK, India, Vietnam, and Italy) each ranged from 12% to 15%accounted for 12-15%, as opposed to a much lower 5%negligible 5% for New Zealand.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 8.0

The response selects and compares the main trends very effectively, with an accurate overview and well-organised supporting data. Its chief weakness is occasional imprecision in expressions such as “adding up to” for separate figures and “four over five countries,” which slightly reduces lexical and grammatical polish. Prioritise precise comparative phrasing and natural quantifier forms while retaining the clear grouping of key features.

Band score breakdown

IELTS Writing Criteria Scores

TA

Task Achievement

8.0
Scoring rule

The overview identifies all principal movements, and the body reports the major values and comparisons accurately.

Next step

Make the final-year comparison more exact by giving individual figures instead of compressing four countries into a broad range.

CC

Coherence and Cohesion

8.0
Scoring rule

Information progresses logically from the overview through the three years, with clear paragraphing and effective comparisons.

Next step

Use linking phrases only where their logical relationship is exact, especially when moving from ranks to separate values.

LR

Lexical Resource

7.0
Scoring rule

A broad range of trend and comparison vocabulary is used confidently, though a few collocations are imprecise.

Next step

Replace expressions such as “adding up to” and “immigrant demographics” with wording that precisely describes separate proportions.

GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

8.0
Scoring rule

Varied complex structures are controlled well, with only occasional localised errors that do not impede meaning.

Next step

Proofread quantifier constructions so forms such as “four of the five countries” are consistently accurate.

Put the feedback to work

Write this task while it is fresh

Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.

IELTS Academic Writing Task 1

The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962, 1982 and 2002.

Your response

Words0
20:00

Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.