Some people believe that children’s leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
To derive a double benefit from anything is considered a bonus, and this is especially the case when discussing leisure activities for children. The idea of fusingThe idea to fuse both education and entertainment into one activity is a goal of many educators; some even believesome would even believe that failure to do this makes the activity pointless. Drawing from examples in Sweden and reviewing games, such as Pokemon, I firmly believe that all activities should have an educational value.
Leisure time is a perfect opportunityLeisure activities are a perfect time to take advantage of a child's receptivenessthe receptiveness in a child’s mind, and some countries are adamant about this. Take Sweden, for example. For many years Sweden has legally stipulatedthey have legally stipulated that all children’s toys sold in the country should have some educational value. In addition, for such a rule to be passed it must be upheld by scientific research. Therefore, the advantage of incorporating an educationaleducation element into toys is scientifically proven.
On the other hand, inacross the UK, children were wasting their time collecting and learning the statistics of each creature on each Pokemon card. If, however, these cards had been supplementedintertwined with more educational data the child could have simultaneously gained a more practical education. Due to the child learning large swathes of irrelevant and useless information it can be argued that the time would have been better spent with real facts and figures on the cards.
To conclude, scientific evidence from Sweden and fantasy games such as Pokemon with little educational value are two clear reasons why children’s leisure activities should have an element of learning involved.
Why this response received Band 8.0
The essay presents a firm position and sustains it through two clearly organised, relevant examples, using varied vocabulary and generally precise complex sentences. Its main limitation is that the supporting logic is sometimes overclaimed: the Sweden example is treated as scientific proof, and the Pokémon example does not fully establish that non-educational leisure is worthless. The highest priority is to qualify these claims and explain more directly why every leisure activity must contain educational value.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response directly answers the question, maintains a clear position, and develops two relevant lines of support, though some claims are overstated.
Strengthen the argument by qualifying the examples and explicitly showing why educational value should be required in every leisure activity.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ideas progress clearly through well-focused paragraphs, with cohesive devices and referencing used effectively throughout.
Refine the transition into the Pokémon paragraph so that it signals contrast in context without suggesting a change in the writer's position.
Lexical Resource
A wide and precise vocabulary is used flexibly, with only occasional slightly awkward combinations.
Prefer more natural phrasing such as educational element and combined with educational content in the few awkward expressions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The essay uses varied complex structures with strong control and only minor, non-impeding lapses.
Polish pronoun reference and article choice in sentences such as the Sweden example to make already strong grammar fully precise.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Some people believe that children’s leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.