Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Do you agree or disagree?
This response is estimated at Band 6.5. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
In recent times, environmental destruction hashave a significant impact on the clean water supply, which is essential for daily household needs. It is generally believed that clean water should be provided to societyprovided to the society without any extra financial cost, with which Ii strongly disagree.
It is evident that water is a substantial part of the daily life of every citizen around the world. As a result, countriesaround the world, as a result, countries are experiencing serious challenges and problems in providing clean water resources . The notion that providing water to the society without additional financial expenses has only beneficial outcomesoutcome is wrong, as it creates severe economic issues all around the world. The production of clean water supplies is associated with major expensesconnected to major expenses. Subsequently, providing water without getting any financial support from societysupport from the society will takehave a serious toll on countries' economic advancement and will result in profound issues, namely, economic downfall and the lack of clean water resources.
On the other hand, as the cost of clean watercost of the clean water is rising every year many familiesa lot of families do notdon't have enough financial support to get access to clean water. For example, in a lot of underdeveloped countries all around the world people have limited access to clean waterhave a limited access to the clean water, as a result a huge number of families are obligated to get their water supplies from rivers and lakes. Consuming unfiltered water leads to some serious complications, such as health deterioration and in some cases even premature death. However, the reductionBut the reduction of the price of clean waterprices of the clean water won't automatically solve this problem and will lead to more severe and long-lasting issues. As a result, I personally think that health organisations and governments from all around the world should collaborate in order to find alternative ways for providing clean water supplies to poor countries, without causing any more unnecessaryunnecessery problems.
To sum up, providing water supplies free of charge will not be able to solvewon't be able solve major global issues without causing more severe global problems and challenges in the future.
Why this response received Band 6.5
The essay presents a clear position throughout, arguing against providing free household water and offering relevant supporting ideas. Progression is broadly logical, though transition devices are occasionally used mechanically or inappropriately. To enhance your score, refine complex sentence constructions to eliminate run-on comma splices and focus on precise vocabulary choices.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
You take a clear position against free water supply and support it with relevant economic and practical arguments.
Ensure all main ideas directly answer the exact prompt by clearly explaining how targeted government assistance could work instead of a completely free system.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing is logical, but linking words like 'On the other hand' and 'as a result' are used loosely or repetitively.
Use cohesive devices more naturally to show logical relationships rather than relying on overused transitional phrases.
Lexical Resource
An adequate vocabulary range is demonstrated, though word choices and collocations are occasionally inaccurate.
Focus on accurate word partnerships and topic-specific vocabulary instead of relying on generic phrases like 'profound issues' or 'unnecessary problems'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is attempted, but comma splices and subject-verb agreement errors are noticeably present.
Eliminate run-on sentences by correctly joining independent clauses with semicolons or conjunctions rather than just commas.