Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Response
It is argued that every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. I completely agree with this view for two main reasons. The primary reason for my opinion is that clean water is essential for people's health and basic needs. One study found that people could survive for 7 days without food. However, if they could not access clean water, they might survive for only about 3 days. In addition, people use clean water daily for essential tasks, such as washing clothes and bathing.every day, such as washing clothes, taking a shower and so on. Without access to clean water, people may face many serious problems. This clearly demonstrates that access to clean water is a basic human right and every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Furthermore, access to clean water free of charge is important to low-income families. This is because these families often face many financial problems. If they had to pay for clean water, they could not afford other services such as education or healthcaremedication. Therefore, the governmentSo the government should ensure that clean water is provided for free. It can reduce the financial burden onfor poor familiesfamiles. Thus, these families can afford other essential services. This example explains the importance of access to clean water free of charge. In conclusion, I completely agree that every home should have a water supply free of charge because clean water is essential for people's health and it can reduce the financial burdenreduce financial burden for low-income families. Both of thesefor low-income families. These two reasons firmly support my agreement with this view.
Why this response received Band 6.5
The essay presents a clear position throughout, directly addressing the prompt with relevant main supporting arguments. The main weakness lies in repetitive phrasing and simplistic vocabulary choices that limit the sophisticated expression of ideas. To improve, focus on expanding academic vocabulary and varying sentence structures to create smoother transitions between points.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
The response clearly states a position in agreement with the prompt and supports it with relevant points regarding health and financial support for low-income families.
Develop arguments more deeply by considering potential counterarguments or economic implications to provide a more nuanced discussion.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphing is logical and ideas progress clearly overall, though paragraph conclusions tend to feel repetitive.
Vary cohesive devices and avoid repeating identical thesis-restating sentences at the end of body paragraphs.
Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is adequate to convey the main message, but reliance on repeated phrases from the prompt is noticeable.
Incorporate a broader range of synonyms and topic-specific vocabulary to reduce word repetition throughout the essay.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The response demonstrates good control over basic and complex structures with generally accurate conditional and cause-and-effect clauses.
Enhance grammatical variety by using more advanced structures, such as passive voice or participle clauses, while maintaining accuracy.
Write this task while it is fresh
Try the same task now. It helps you remember the feedback and write better next time.
IELTS Writing Task 2
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Do you agree or disagree?
Your response
Write the task yourself, then compare your choices with the annotated response.