Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Do you agree or disagree?
This response is estimated at Band 7.0. Can you write a better one?
Write yours and get clear feedback on all four criteria.
- Closest to official scores
- What to fix on each criterion
- Feedback in about 20 seconds · free
Sample Response
In recent times, environmental destruction has had a significant impact on the clean water supply, which is essential for daily household needs. It is generally believed that clean water should be provided to society free of charge, with which I strongly disagree.
It is evident that water is a substantial part of the daily life of every citizen around the world; nevertheless, many countriescountries , countries are experiencing formidableserious formidable obstacles in providing clean water resources. The notion that providing water to the public free of charge has only a beneficial outcome is wrong, as it creates severe economic issues all around the world. The production of clean water supplies entailsis entails substantial capital investment . Subsequently, providing water without revenue generated from consumersconsumer will take a serious toll on national economic growth and lead to severe fiscal strain, economic declinedownfall and the lack of clean water resources.
Admittedly, as the cost of clean water is rising every year, many families do not have enough financial support to get access to clean water. For example, in many underdeveloped countries all around the world, people have limited access to clean water; as a result, a vasthuge number of families are forced to get their water supplies from rivers and lakes. Consuming unfiltered water leads to some serious complications, such as health deterioration and in some cases even premature death. However, reducing the price of clean water prices of the clean water will not automatically solve this problem and will lead to more severe and long-lasting issues. As a result, I personally think that health organizations and governments from all around the world should collaborate in order to find alternative ways to provide clean water supplies to poor countries, without causing further complicationsany more unnecessary problems.
To sum up, providing water supplies free of charge will not be able to solve major global issues without causing more severe economic and environmental challenges in the future.
Why this response received Band 7.0
The essay presents a clear position throughout, effectively arguing against free water provision by examining economic and long-term sustainability challenges. The main limitation lies in proofreading lapses, such as duplicate words and grammatical slips that detract from sentence accuracy. Prioritizing careful self-editing during writing will immediately enhance the clarity and polished quality of your work.
IELTS Writing Criteria Scores
Task Response
You maintain a clear position throughout the essay and support your central arguments with relevant, logical reasoning.
Fully flesh out your proposed solutions or alternative measures to ensure every argument is thoroughly developed.
Coherence and Cohesion
Paragraphs are well-structured with clear topic sentences and a logical progression of ideas across the response.
Refine transitional phrases to ensure smoother connections between contrasting sentences within paragraphs.
Lexical Resource
You demonstrate a good range of advanced vocabulary appropriate for discussing economic and social topics.
Focus on precision in word choice and collocations to avoid minor naturalness issues.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
A variety of complex structures is attempted, though minor grammatical errors and repeated word typos reduce overall accuracy.
Reserve time at the end to thoroughly proofread for editing slips like redundant words or incorrect verb formations.