Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining outside. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In contemporary society, 1how young people should spendhow should young people spend their time after work is an issue that few can afford to ignore. Opinions are divided between those who believe that they should spend more time staying at home with their families and those who maintain that young adults should go outside for entertainments and enjoy their time. While there is some merit in each perspective, I find the latter more compelling.

2To begin with, this position is grounded in both sound reasoning and practical considerations. One of the strongest arguments in its favour is that 3outdoor recreationoutside entertainments are beneficial for young people to 4relieve stressrelease pressures and negative emotions. This reasoning carries considerable weight because young adults have to face 5intense competitionintensive competitions in today’s society, and going outside to have a rest is necessary for them to 6improvecure their physical and psychological health 7by being close to natureby closing to the nature, thereby strengthening the case for this position. 8A growing body of research lends support to the conclusion that 9according to social statisticsaccording to a social statistics, the number of young people between 20-30 years old in Beijing entertain outside regularly and have psychological issues was 30% less than the figure for young people staying at home during their spare time. A further consideration that warrants closer examination is that if they spend more time at home with their families after stressful work, they might bring negative emotions to their families, 10and even experience conflicteven have conflicts with their family members. The logic underpinning this point is that negative emotions can be 11contagiousinfected, especially between families . It is only by considering these two factors together that we can fully appreciate the strength of this argument.

Compelling though this position may be, the opposing view also has its merits. 12One potential objection is that home staying is a good way for each family without physical, a concern that arises from the fact that home is the 13naturallynatural safer place for people to 14open up to their family membersopen their heart to their families. On closer examination, however, a fundamental flaw in the logic of this argument becomes apparent: home can add pressures partly. The explanation for this lies in the fact that staying at home 15makes individuals dwell on stressful issuesmake individuals rethink stressful and worried things. This problem becomes particularly evident when we consider that over 1682% of male citizens82% male citizens in China feel more stressed when they are at home. In light of this limitation, the opposing view, while understandable, does not carry enough weight to be decisive.

In conclusion, although this issue remains a matter of debate, the position that spending more time entertaining outside and 17accompanying their familiesaccompany families by camping and doing other outside activities 18stands outis stands out as the more balanced and practical one.