Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining outside. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In contemporary society, how young people should spend their spare time is an issue that few can afford to ignore. Opinions are divided between those who believe that young 1peoplemen should spend more time staying at home with their families and those who maintain that entertaining outside is more necessary. While there is some merit in each perspective, I find the latter more compelling.

To begin with, 2the view favoring outdoor leisure is grounded in practical considerations.this position is grounded in both sound reasoning and practical considerations. One of the strongest arguments in its favour is that being close to nature 3helps young people relieve their stressis beneficial for young people to relieve their pressure and negative emotions due to 4innate human traitshuman's innated traits, which cannot be replaced by staying at home with their families. This reasoning carries considerable weight because young adults have to face many challenges and difficulties in today’s competitive society and relieving their depressive 5moodsemotions is extremely important, thereby strengthening the case for this position. A growing body of research lends support to the conclusion that among people aged 20-30 with psychological issues in Beijing, the number of those who do outdoor activities regularly was 30% lower than the number of those who 6stayedstay at home. A further consideration that warrants closer examination is that engaging in outdoor entertainment can also improve young people’s social skills and build their self-confidence, and this can enhance young people’s patience and 7resilience under pressureability to resist pressure.

Compelling though this position may be, the opposing view has its merits. One 8compelling argumentpotential objection is that staying at home with their families can save young people money, energy and time and help them to have more family time. 9Many outdoor activities are not suitable for older people and young children. This is partly because going outside for entertainment can sometimes make young people feel more tired. On closer examination, however, a fundamental flaw in the logic of this argument becomes apparent: young people staying at home with their families before relieving their stress may 10lead to more conflictsmake more new conflicts. More importantly, many young adults report that they often argue with their families when they return home from work. 11It is so difficult for them to control their temper, and going home 12can even make themeven makes them feel more stressed. This problem becomes particularly evident when we consider that many outdoor activities can 13provide similar benefits toreach the similar advantages of staying at home. For instance, many outdoor activities can be done with families and are appropriate for each family member, such as holding a party in a park or 14besidebesides a lake, having a picnic on the grass on a sunny day, or going camping in nearby places with 15scenic viewsgood landscapes. 16Consequently,In light of this limitation, the opposing view, while understandable, is not strong enough to be decisive.

In conclusion, although this issue remains a matter of debate, the position that doing outdoor activities and enjoying 18spending leisure time outdoorsoutdoor family time is necessary for young people stands out as the more balanced and practical one.